extraction Clinical Trials
A listing of extraction medical research trials actively recruiting patient volunteers. Search for closest city to find more detailed information on a research study in your area.
Found 90 clinical trials
Clinical Results of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for the Correction of High Myopia
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) was introduced in 2011 using the VISUMAX femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). It is designed for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. It involves the creation of a corneal tissue disk called lenticule and its extraction through a minimally invasive incision, utilizing only …
AP-NOSES: A Prospective Multicentre Registry of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery
Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is a minimally invasive colorectal surgical technique in which the surgical specimen is removed through a natural orifice, including transanal or transvaginal routes, thereby avoiding an abdominal extraction incision. Observational studies suggest that NOSE may reduce wound-related morbidity and improve postoperative recovery, but prospective multicenter …
Short-term and Long-term Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Treated With Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery : a National Registry-based Study
Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has gained widespread recognition among scholars and has gradually been promoted and popularized around the world. However, the development of NOSES is still in the exploratory stage and there is a lack of strong evidence from evidence-based medicine to support its feasibility and safety, …
PeptiCol EZgraft in the Extraction Socket Preservation Process After Tooth Extraction
This clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of applying "PeptiCol EZgraft" in extraction socket preservation procedures against "Regenomer," in terms of reducing the amount of alveolar bone change during the healing process following tooth extraction.
Pacemaker and Defibrillator Lead Extraction Registry
Implanted cardiac devices are commonly used to treat a wide variety of heart diseases, including arrhythmias, cardiac resynchronization in select heart failure patients, and life threatening heart rhythms. Approximately 400,000 devices are implanted annually, and more than 3 million patients currently have implanted devices1. Implanted cardiac devices are made to …
Management of Multiple Adjacent Extraction Sockets
While early implant placement with guided bone regeneration (GBR) offers advantages, the desire for reduced treatment time and fewer surgical steps continues to drive the exploration of alternative approaches. In this context, the recent introduction of vestibular socket therapy (VST) presents an intriguing option. VST utilizes a minimally invasive tunnel …
Post-Extraction Healing: microRepair vs Chlorhexidine
This randomized clinical trial evaluates the efficacy of a microRepair ABX mouthwash mousse compared to 0.20% chlorhexidine in promoting wound healing following tooth extraction. The study monitors clinical parameters such as pain, swelling, and healing indices at 1, 7, and 15 days post-surgery. The primary objective is to determine if …
Comparison of Femto LDV Z8 Corneal Lenticule Extraction for Advanced Refractive Correction (CLEAR) and Visumax Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)
This observational study aims to compare two laser corrective procedures for treating myopia and myopic astigmatism: a novel refractive technique, the CLEAR procedure, and the established SMILE procedure. Participants will be randomized to undergo CLEAR in one eye and SMILE in the other. The investigators will evaluate and compare the …
Spring Loaded Syringe for Active Silicon Oil Extraction
The aim of our study is to compare between two techniques used for active SOR. The outcomes include efficiency and safety. Patients with silicon filled eyes and prepared for SOR 540 eyes of 505 patients (one eye in 470 patients, and both eyes in 35 patients) were enrolled in the …
Buccal Infiltration of Different Volumes of Articaine for Extraction.
This study compares the effectiveness of two different volumes of buccal infiltration of Articaine for the extraction of mandibular posterior teeth. One group receives buccal infiltration of 1.8 ml of 4% Articaine and the other group receives buccal infiltration of 3.6 ml of 4% Articaine.
