Image

Blood Clotting Markers and Heart Ultrasound in People With Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation

Blood Clotting Markers and Heart Ultrasound in People With Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation

Recruiting
50 years and older
All
Phase N/A

Powered by AI

Overview

The purpose of this observational study is to investigate whether blood tests related to blood clotting are associated with established clinical stroke risk scores, the total amount of device-detected atrial fibrillation recorded by an implanted cardiac device, and ultrasound measurements of the heart in people with device-detected atrial fibrillation. The study will also evaluate whether these baseline measurements are associated with future clinical outcomes and may improve future stroke risk assessment.

Device-detected atrial fibrillation is an irregular heart rhythm detected by implanted cardiac devices such as pacemakers, implantable cardiac monitors, and implantable defibrillators. It is often brief and does not cause symptoms. Although it increases the risk of stroke and systemic embolism, the risk is lower than in people with clinically diagnosed atrial fibrillation. As a result, it remains difficult to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from blood-thinning medication, which reduces the risk of stroke but also increases the risk of bleeding.

The study will include 222 participants with implanted cardiac devices, including 111 participants with device-detected atrial fibrillation and 111 age-, sex-, and cardiac device indication-matched control participants without device-detected atrial fibrillation. At baseline, participants will undergo blood sampling, ultrasound examination of the heart, and routine device interrogation. Information on medical history and established clinical stroke risk factors will also be collected. The implanted cardiac device will be used to determine the total amount of device-detected atrial fibrillation recorded during the year before study inclusion.

The baseline analyses will investigate whether established clinical stroke risk scores, the total amount of device-detected atrial fibrillation, and heart ultrasound findings are associated with changes in blood clotting that may indicate an increased tendency to form blood clots. The study will evaluate both primary and additional blood clotting markers to improve the understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying thromboembolic risk in device-detected atrial fibrillation.

Participants will subsequently be followed for 10 years to determine whether baseline blood clotting markers, the total amount of device-detected atrial fibrillation, heart ultrasound findings, and clinical stroke risk scores are associated with future clinical outcomes, including stroke, systemic embolism, hospitalization, death, progression to clinically diagnosed atrial fibrillation, and initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy.

The findings may improve the understanding of thromboembolic risk in people with device-detected atrial fibrillation and support the development of more individualized approaches to future stroke risk assessment and treatment.

Description

Scientific Rationale Device-detected atrial fibrillation (DDAF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke and systemic embolism, although the risk is lower than in patients with clinically diagnosed atrial fibrillation. Consequently, it remains challenging to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from oral anticoagulant therapy while minimizing the risk of bleeding. Current stroke risk assessment in patients with device-detected atrial fibrillation relies primarily on clinical risk scores and does not incorporate haemostatic biomarkers, the burden of device-detected atrial fibrillation, or echocardiographic markers of atrial remodeling that may contribute to thromboembolic risk. This study aims to improve the understanding of thromboembolic risk in patients with DDAF and to evaluate whether integrating clinical stroke risk scores, DDAF burden, advanced echocardiographic variables, and haemostatic biomarkers may improve future stroke risk assessment.

Study Design This is a prospective, single-center observational cohort study conducted at the Department of Cardiology, Esbjerg and Grindsted Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, in collaboration with the Unit for Thrombosis Research, Department of Clinical Diagnostics.

The study consists of a single prospective observational cohort with three prespecified baseline analyses followed by a prospective 10-year longitudinal follow-up. A total of 222 participants will be enrolled, including 111 participants with device-detected atrial fibrillation and 111 control participants matched for age, sex, and indication for cardiac device implantation.

Baseline Assessments At baseline, all participants will undergo standardized blood sampling, comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, and collection of demographic and clinical information. Device interrogation will be performed to quantify the burden of device-detected atrial fibrillation. Clinical thromboembolic risk will be assessed using the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. In addition, the ABC-stroke score will be calculated to evaluate its associations with haemostatic biomarkers and subsequent clinical outcomes in participants with device-detected atrial fibrillation.

Independent variables in the prespecified baseline analyses include the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, the ABC-stroke score, burden of device-detected atrial fibrillation, and advanced echocardiographic variables.

The baseline analyses are designed to address three prespecified objectives. Together, these analyses are intended to determine whether established clinical stroke risk scores, burden of device-detected atrial fibrillation, and cardiac structural and functional abnormalities are associated with a more prothrombotic haemostatic profile.

  1. To investigate whether the primary haemostatic biomarkers, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and von Willebrand factor antigen, differ between participants with device-detected atrial fibrillation and matched controls and whether they are associated with the CHA₂DS₂-VASc and ABC-stroke risk scores. Secondary analyses will evaluate associations between additional haemostatic biomarkers and the clinical stroke risk scores.
  2. To investigate whether the primary haemostatic biomarkers are associated with the burden of device-detected atrial fibrillation. Secondary analyses will evaluate associations between DDAF burden and additional haemostatic biomarkers.
  3. To investigate whether the primary haemostatic biomarkers are associated with advanced echocardiographic variables, including left atrial size and function. Secondary analyses will evaluate associations between echocardiographic variables and additional haemostatic biomarkers.

The primary cross-sectional outcome measures are endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and von Willebrand factor antigen. Secondary cross-sectional outcome measures comprise additional biomarkers of coagulation and fibrinolysis.

Longitudinal Follow-up Participants will subsequently be followed for 10 years through electronic health records, routine device interrogation reports, and Danish national health registries. Follow-up data will be collected every second year to evaluate whether baseline primary and secondary haemostatic biomarkers, DDAF burden, clinical stroke risk scores, and echocardiographic findings are associated with subsequent stroke, systemic embolism, hospitalization, death, progression to clinically diagnosed atrial fibrillation, and initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy.

Statistical Analysis The sample size was calculated to provide 80% statistical power at a two-sided significance level of 5% to detect the expected differences in endogenous thrombin potential and von Willebrand factor antigen between predefined CHA₂DS₂-VASc stroke risk groups, based on previously published effect sizes.

Continuous variables will be assessed for normality using histograms and Q-Q plots. Variables with skewed distributions will be logarithmically transformed where appropriate. Homogeneity of variances will be assessed before parametric analyses. Continuous variables will be summarized as mean ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range according to data distribution, whereas categorical variables will be summarized as frequencies and percentages.

Baseline comparisons between participants with device-detected atrial fibrillation and matched controls will be performed using appropriate parametric or non-parametric statistical methods according to data distribution. Multivariable regression models will be adjusted for predefined confounding variables as appropriate.

The prespecified baseline analyses will primarily be performed using multivariable linear regression models with endogenous thrombin potential and von Willebrand factor antigen as the primary dependent variables. Secondary analyses will evaluate associations with additional haemostatic biomarkers. Regression models will be adjusted for prespecified confounding variables. Continuous predictors will be assessed for approximate linearity, and the assumptions underlying the linear regression models will be evaluated before interpretation of the results. Sensitivity analyses will be performed to evaluate the robustness of the primary findings. Adjustment for multiple testing will be performed using the Holm-Bonferroni procedure.

Longitudinal analyses will evaluate whether baseline haemostatic biomarkers, burden of device-detected atrial fibrillation, clinical stroke risk scores, and echocardiographic findings are associated with subsequent clinical outcomes. Time-to-event analyses will be performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models when appropriate. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals will be reported. Statistical significance will be defined as a two-sided p-value \<0.05.

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age \> 50 years at inclusion
  • Implanted cardiac device with an atrial electrode
  • ≥1 episode of device-detected atrial fibrillation lasting ≥1 minute, detected at routine cardiac device interrogation within the last 12 months
  • Written informed consent obtained prior to inclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of ECG-documented atrial fibrillation at any time prior to inclusion
  • Use of oral anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy within 6 months prior to inclusion, irrespective of indication
  • Current treatment with oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • End-stage renal disease (creatinine clearance \<15 mL/min, calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation)
  • Active malignancy, defined as cancer diagnosis not followed by curative treatment within 6 months of diagnosis
  • Major surgery within the last 3 months
  • Connective tissue disease requiring treatment
  • Acute coronary syndrome, stroke/transient ischemic attack, or venous thromboembolism within 3 months prior to inclusion
  • Known thrombophilia
  • Clinically significant hepatic or hematological disease requiring treatment and/or specialist follow-up
  • Mechanical heart valve, moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis, or other valvular disease requiring intervention

Study details
    Device-detected Atrial Fibrillation
    Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation
    Atrial High Rate Episodes

NCT07713615

Andreas Sjøholm-Christensen

25 July 2026

Step 1 Get in touch with the nearest study center
We have submitted the contact information you provided to the research team at {{SITE_NAME}}. A copy of the message has been sent to your email for your records.
Would you like to be notified about other trials? Sign up for Patient Notification Services.
Sign up

Send a message

Enter your contact details to connect with study team

Investigator Avatar

Primary Contact

  Other languages supported:

First name*
Last name*
Email*
Phone number*
Other language

FAQs

Learn more about clinical trials

What is a clinical trial?

A clinical trial is a study designed to test specific interventions or treatments' effectiveness and safety, paving the way for new, innovative healthcare solutions.

Why should I take part in a clinical trial?

Participating in a clinical trial provides early access to potentially effective treatments and directly contributes to the healthcare advancements that benefit us all.

How long does a clinical trial take place?

The duration of clinical trials varies. Some trials last weeks, some years, depending on the phase and intention of the trial.

Do I get compensated for taking part in clinical trials?

Compensation varies per trial. Some offer payment or reimbursement for time and travel, while others may not.

How safe are clinical trials?

Clinical trials follow strict ethical guidelines and protocols to safeguard participants' health. They are closely monitored and safety reviewed regularly.
Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.