Description

Atrial fibrillation and tricuspid regurgitation frequently coexist in clinical practice. Atrial fibrillation may promote right atrial enlargement and tricuspid annular dilatation, which can aggravate functional tricuspid regurgitation over time. Conversely, significant tricuspid regurgitation may further increase right-sided volume overload, worsen atrial remodeling, and contribute to the persistence or progression of atrial fibrillation. This bidirectional relationship may lead to heart failure, thromboembolic events, and an increased need for tricuspid valve intervention.

Although early rhythm control has been shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes in selected patients with atrial fibrillation, its clinical benefit in patients with concomitant tricuspid regurgitation has not been well established. In particular, it remains uncertain whether maintaining sinus rhythm at an early stage can slow the progression of right-sided cardiac remodeling, reduce heart failure events, and improve long-term prognosis in this population.

This study is designed to evaluate the prognostic impact of early rhythm control compared with usual care in patients with atrial fibrillation and tricuspid regurgitation. The primary endpoint will be a composite of cardiac death, heart failure admission, stroke, and tricuspid valve surgery. By comparing these clinically meaningful outcomes between the two treatment strategies, this study aims to clarify whether early rhythm control should be considered as an active therapeutic approach in patients with atrial fibrillation complicated by tricuspid regurgitation.

The study will use retrospectively collected data from patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and tricuspid regurgitation between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2023. Clinical outcomes will be assessed during this observation period.