Overview
The goal of this observational ambispective study is to compare the effectiveness of two pain management strategies in pediatric patients undergoing the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the addition of phrenic Infiltration as Cryo Adjuvant (PhICA) to earlier percutaneous intercostal cryoanalgesia (EPIC) reduce postoperative pain scores compared to EPIC alone? Does the combined EPIC + PhICA technique reduce the need for rescue tramadol compared to EPIC alone? Do the two approaches differ in: length of hospital stay, time to transition to oral therapy, and time to mobilization? Are there any side effects
Researchers will compare patients who received EPIC alone to patients who received EPIC + PhICA to see if the combined technique provides superior pain control.
- Participants
Received either EPIC alone or EPIC combined with PhICA as part of their surgical anesthesia plan Had pain levels assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at regular postoperative intervals Were monitored for rescue tramadol requirements, medicaments taken, length of hospital stay, and mobilization timing Were monitored for any technique-related complication
Description
This is a retrospective-prospective (ambispective) study as it compares a control group (EPIC) retrospectively reviewed with a prospectively recruited case group of patients (PhICA)
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients who undergo minimally invasive repair at the pediatric surgery department of our referral tertiary center
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients who refuse OR whose parents refuse to participate in the study
