Description

Gastroesophageal junction cancers represent a challenging oncological entity, particularly in patients with locally advanced Siewert type II-III tumors. Total gastrectomy has traditionally been considered the standard surgical treatment; however, proximal gastrectomy has gained increasing interest in recent years due to potential advantages in postoperative functional outcomes and reduced surgical morbidity. Nevertheless, concerns remain regarding the adequacy of oncological clearance and lymph node dissection with proximal gastrectomy.

This multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial is designed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and oncological outcomes of proximal gastrectomy compared with total gastrectomy in patients with locally advanced Siewert type II-III gastroesophageal junction cancer. Patients diagnosed through endoscopic and histopathological evaluation and deemed operable after multidisciplinary tumor board discussion will be included. Following informed consent, participants will be randomized in a parallel design to undergo either proximal gastrectomy or total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection (D2 lymphadenectomy). Surgical procedures may be performed via open, laparoscopic, or robotic approaches based on surgeon preference and patient suitability.

Baseline demographic characteristics, perioperative variables, pathological findings, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term oncological outcomes will be prospectively recorded. The primary endpoint is 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), while secondary endpoints include postoperative complications, mortality, and the number of metastatic lymph nodes. Patients will be followed at predefined intervals for up to five years after surgery. The results of this study are expected to provide high-level evidence to guide surgical decision-making in the management of locally advanced gastroesophageal junction cancers.