Overview
The purpose of this study is to compare two types of wearable lower-extremity exoskeletons -a self-balancing device lower-extremity exoskeleton and a user-balancing device lower-extremity exoskeleton-to better understand their effects on the physiological responses to walking and the user experience in people with spinal cord injury.
Description
Although Lower Limb Exoskeleton technology holds promise for improving mobility and independence in people with Spinal Cord Injury, limited research has examined the physiological and psychological effects of walking with self-balancing lower limb exoskeleton technology compared to systems that require user-operated assistive aids. Moreover, no studies to date have directly compared the short- and long-term outcomes of two lower limb exoskeleton technology types: (1) self-balancing and (2) user-balancing. To address this gap, this study will conduct a head-to-head comparison of self-balancing and user-balancing lower limb exoskeleton technology in individuals with motor-complete (ASIA Impairment Scale Classification \[AIS\] A/B) Spinal Cord Injury-a population that remains underrepresented in rehabilitation robotics research despite advances in the field.
Study participants will complete 5 walking sessions and 2 test sessions with two different exoskeleton devices in a randomized order. During each test session, data will be collected using motion sensors, portable metabolic monitors, and muscle sensors.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subacute to chronic SCI (≥ 3mths post injury)
- Motor-complete (ASIA Impairment Scale classification A/B)
- Injury level T3-T11
- Age 18-70 yrs
- Height between 5'1" and 6'1"
- Weight \<200 lbs (90kg)
- Seated hip width \< 42cm
- Standing tolerance \> 15mins
- Have sufficient upper limb strength to use a platform rolling walker, rolling walker, or forearm crutches
- Currently medically cleared and enrolled in the Shepherd Center Beyond Therapy program
- Medically cleared for weight-bearing activities
- Able to follow directions to safely participate in assessments
Exclusion Criteria:
- Existing skin lesions or wounds
- Hip or knee contracture \> 10 degrees or ankle contracture \> 5 degrees
- Severe or uncontrolled spasticity
- Non-healing fractures
- Uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia
- Heart or peripheral vascular condition
- Pregnancy
- Active heterotopic ossification
- Active deep vein thrombosis
- Cognitive deficits that make it difficult for participants to follow verbal instructions or making it unsafe to participate in assessments.
- Any reason the principal investigator feels the potential participant may not be safe to participate in the study