Overview
Scientists do research to answer important questions which might help change or improve the way we do things in the future.
The investigators know that using glasses with special attachments that provide magnification (dental loupes) for dental procedures results in better healing than not using magnification. This study will test if using a microscope, that gives much higher magnification, can result in even better healing than using dental loupes.
Description
A two-arm split mouth randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of using an experimental microsurgical approach with a digital microscope (Group 1) or standard of care surgical approach with dental loupes (Group 2) on post-operative wound healing of two standardized vertical releasing incisions. The split mouth design will ensure that each patient serves as their own control.
The hypothesis is that the wound closure technique in Group 1: Microsurgical approach with digital microscope will have improved periodontal flap vertical releasing incision wound healing as compared to the Group 2: Standard of Care surgical approach with dental loupes.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ability of subject to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
- Males and females; Age 18 -89 years old
- Require surgical flap treatment of periodontal disease
- Either maxillary or mandibular arch
- ASA I or II
- Has consistent transportation for all clinical and study visits
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy, or those planning to become pregnant
- Diabetics with an HbA1c \>7.1
- Not eligible for surgical periodontal therapy
- Require vertical or horizontal hard tissue augmentation
- Non-English speaking