Image

COLONYVAQ™, a Quantum-Classical Guided Personalized Neoantigen Vaccine for MSS Stage III Colorectal Cancer

COLONYVAQ™, a Quantum-Classical Guided Personalized Neoantigen Vaccine for MSS Stage III Colorectal Cancer

Recruiting
All
Phase 0

Powered by AI

Overview

This is an early phase I, single-arm, open-label clinical study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of COLONYVAQ-CRC, a physics-aware, quantum-classical AI-guided personalized neoantigen peptide vaccine, administered in combination with standard adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) and nivolumab 3 mg/kg in patients with completely resected stage III microsatellite-stable (MSS) / proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) colorectal cancer. An initial safety cohort of 12 patients will be enrolled and closely monitored for toxicity attributable to the experimental vaccine preparation. If, among these 12 patients, fewer than 3 develop experimental-preparation-related toxicity greater than grade 2 and no patient develops experimental-preparation-related grade 4 toxicity, the study will expand to enroll a total of 50 patients. Primary objectives focus on safety and tolerability of the combination regimen. Secondary and exploratory objectives characterize neoantigen-specific immune responses, ctDNA dynamics, T-cell receptor (TCR) clonotype evolution, tumor immune microenvironment features, and preliminary disease control (disease-free survival and overall survival) to inform subsequent phase II design.

Description

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. In stage III disease, recurrence remains frequent despite curative-intent surgery and adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed outcomes in mismatch repair-deficient / microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer, but microsatellite-stable / pMMR tumors typically exhibit a lower tumor mutational burden and a poorly inflamed, immunosuppressive microenvironment. As a result, conventional PD-1 blockade alone provides minimal benefit in MSS/pMMR disease. Earlier vaccine approaches in colorectal cancer focused on tumor-associated antigens such as CEA, MUC1, survivin, MAGE and multi-TAA peptide cocktails. These studies showed that peptide and dendritic-cell-based vaccines can induce antigen-specific T-cell and B-cell responses, yet objective responses were rare, clinical benefit was modest, and off-tumor toxicities were a concern because TAAs are frequently expressed in normal tissues. Tumor-specific neoantigens, generated by non-synonymous somatic mutations, are in contrast restricted to malignant cells, escape central tolerance, can elicit higher-avidity T-cell responses, and minimize off-tumor toxicity. Early colorectal and pan-cancer neoantigen trials, as well as shared-neoantigen programs such as SLATE-KRAS and fully personalized viral-RNA platforms such as GRANITE, have demonstrated that multi-neoantigen vaccination is feasible, safe, and immunogenic, particularly in low-burden or maintenance settings and when combined with checkpoint blockade. The adjuvant neoantigen dendritic cell vaccine plus nivolumab trial in resected hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases further supports the idea that personalized neoantigen vaccination in the minimal residual disease (MRD) setting can augment neoantigen-specific T-cell responses and potentially improve relapse-free survival. Oxaliplatin-based regimens (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) can induce immunogenic cell death, exposing calreticulin and other danger signals that enhance dendritic cell uptake and cross-presentation of tumor antigens. Nivolumab, by blocking PD-1, relieves inhibitory signaling on activated T cells. Combining a personalized multi-neoantigen peptide vaccine with immunogenic chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade is therefore expected to increase antigen release, improve antigen presentation, and augment effector function, potentially converting immunologically "cold" MSS tumors into more inflamed, "hot" lesions amenable to durable immune surveillance in the adjuvant setting.

COLONYVAQ-CRC: Quantum-Classical, Physics-Aware Neoantigen Prioritization Most existing neoantigen pipelines treat epitope ranking as mainly statistical. COLONYVAQ-CRC introduces a physics-aware, quantum-classical AI layer, adapted from Tamavaq, to generate an auditable, mechanistic chain from sequencing to clinical peptide selection. For each candidate peptide-HLA pair p, the system constructs a unified feature representation Φ(p), which concatenates sequence-based, biological, quantum, structural, and energetic evidence: Φ(p)=\[e\_"CNN" (p),"" aux(p),"" z\_Q (p),"" ϕ\_"struct" (p),""ϕ\_"dock" (p)\]. The term e\_"CNN" (p) denotes a deep sequence/HLA embedding derived from convolutional or transformer models trained on large immunopeptidome datasets. The auxiliary block aux(p) compiles antigen processing and expression priors such as proteasomal cleavage likelihood, TAP transport propensity, transcript abundance, clonality and, when available, ctDNA/MRD information to approximate the effective antigen source strength. The quantum descriptor z\_Q (p) is a low-dimensional classical vector that parameterizes a quantum circuit embedding. The structural term ϕ\_"struct" (p) summarizes pocket occupancy and residue-residue contacts in modeled peptide-HLA complexes. Finally, ϕ\_"dock" (p) aggregates docking ensemble statistics including pose energies, dispersion and conformational diversity.

Similarity between two candidates p and q is captured by a composite positive semi-definite kernel K\_"total" (p,q)=αK\_"CNN" (p,q)+βK\_"aux" (p,q)+γK\_Q (p,q)+δK\_"struct" (p,q)+εK\_"dock" (p,q), where the non-negative weights α,β,γ,δ,ε adjust the relative contribution of each modality. Because each component kernel is constructed to be positive semi-definite, their non-negative linear combination remains positive semi-definite, ensuring that K\_"total" can be used consistently in kernel logistic regression or related methods. A decision function can be written as f(p)=∑\_(i=1)\^M▒α\_i K\_"total" (p,p\_i)+b, where {p\_i } are training peptides and α\_i,b are learned coefficients. The immunogenicity probability is then modeled as I ̂(p)=σ(f(p)), where σ(z)=1/(1+e\^(-z)) is the logistic function. On the quantum side, each peptide x is encoded as a normalized state ∣ψ(x)⟩ in a Hilbert space H of dimension 2\^n, constructed via a feature map U(z\_Q (x),θ) acting on a reference state ∣0⟩\^(⊗n): ∣ψ(x)⟩=U(z\_Q (x),θ)" "∣0⟩\^(⊗n). The overlap between two peptide states is ⟨ψ(x)∣ψ(y)⟩. Quantum-geometric similarity is quantified by the Fubini-Study distance d\_"FS" (x,y)=arccos⁡(∣⟨ψ(x)∣ψ(y)⟩∣), which lies in \[0ⓜ,π/2\], where d\_"FS" =0 corresponds to identical rays and d\_"FS" =π/2 to orthogonal states. From this distance, a quantum similarity kernel is defined as K\_q (x,y)=〖∣⟨ψ(x)∣ψ(y)⟩∣〗\^2=〖cos⁡〗\^2 (d\_"FS" (x,y)). This kernel can be interpreted as the probability that the state ∣ψ(x)⟩ is projected onto ∣ψ(y)⟩. When low-sequence-identity peptides share higher-order physicochemical structure, they may map to nearby points on this complex projective manifold, generating large K\_q values even when classical sequence similarity is low. The internal structure and entanglement of ∣ψ(x)⟩ are monitored by forming reduced density matrices on subsystems. For a bipartition into subsystems A and B, the reduced state is ρ\_A (x)=Tr\_B (∣ψ(x)⟩⟨ψ(x)∣). The von Neumann entropy S\_A (x)=-Tr\[ρ\_A (x)log⁡ρ\_A (x)\] quantifies entanglement between A and B. A regularization term encourages entropy within a target range, avoiding trivial product states (too little entanglement) and excessively entangled states that can be numerically unstable and difficult to approximate on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware.

The sensitivity of the quantum embedding to parameter changes is characterized by the quantum Fisher information matrix F(θ) with entries F\_ij (θ)=R\[⟨∂\_i ψ∣∂\_j ψ⟩-⟨∂\_i ψ∣ψ⟩⟨ψ∣∂\_j ψ⟩\], where ∣∂\_i ψ⟩=∂∣ψ(θ)⟩/∂θ\_i. Ill-conditioned Fisher matrices, with very small eigenvalues, can lead to large variances in parameter estimates and unstable kernel values. COLONYVAQ therefore introduces a penalty proportional to tr(F(θ)\^(-1)), which diverges when eigenvalues approach zero; minimizing this term nudges optimization toward parameter regions where all directions in parameter space are well informed by the data. Energetics are treated in a thermodynamically calibrated way. For each peptide-HLA docking pose i with standard free energy ΔG\_i\^∘, the microstate association and dissociation constants are K\_(a,i)=exp⁡(ⓜ (ΔG\_i\^∘)/RT),K\_(d,i)=exp⁡((ΔG\_i\^∘)/RT), with R=1.987×10\^(-3) " " kcal⋅mol\^(-1)⋅K\^(-1) and T=310"" K, such that RT≈0.616" " kcal⋅mol\^(-1). The docking ensemble is summarized as a Boltzmann-weighted effective association constant K\_a\^"eff" =∑\_i▒w\_i exp⁡(ⓜ-(ΔG\_i\^∘)/RT),∑\_i▒w\_i =1, yielding an effective free energy ΔG\_"eff" \^∘=-RTln⁡K\_a\^"eff" and corresponding dissociation constant K\_d\^"eff" =1/K\_a\^"eff" . These values are reported in units familiar to experimentalists (kcal·mol-¹ for ΔG\_"eff" \^∘, nM for K\_d\^"eff" ). If the spread of free energies in the ensemble is σ\_ΔG, then the associated uncertainty in K\_dcan be expressed multiplicatively as exp⁡(±σ\_ΔG/(RT)). For example, at T=310"" K, a change of 1.2"" kcal⋅mol\^(-1) in ΔG\^∘ changes K\_d by a factor of approximately exp⁡(1.2/0.616)≈6.3. A docking loss term L\_"dock" =λ\_1 E ˉ+λ\_2 σ\_E, where E ˉ and σ\_E are the mean and standard deviation of docking energies, biases the model toward low-energy, low-variance ensembles that are empirically associated with robust peptide-MHC display. On top of Φ(p) and the kernel K\_"total" , COLONYVAQ trains a calibrated logistic head I ̂(p)=σ(w\^⊤ Φ(p)+b), which is interpreted as the probability that peptide p is recognized by T cells, optimized for both discrimination (for example AUC) and calibration (for example Brier score, expected calibration error). In parallel, a linear thermodynamic head predicts (ΔG) ̂\^∘ (p)=η\^⊤ Φ(p)+η\_0, from which a predicted dissociation constant K ̂\_d (p)=exp⁡((ΔG) ̂\^∘ (p)/(RT)) is derived. The total loss couples prediction, structure, docking and quantum Fisher regularization into a single objective L=L\_"pred" +L\_"struct" +L\_"dock" +L\_"QFIM", with L\_"QFIM" proportional to tr(F(θ)\^(-1)).

Candidate peptides are passed through a three-gate "physics + geometry + immunology" oracle. First, a quantum-geometric gate requires that the Fubini-Study distance between ∣ψ(x)⟩ and a centroid ∣ψ(P)⟩ of empirically validated immunogenic peptides satisfy d\_"FS" (ψ(x),ψ(P))≤d\^"\\\" . Second, a thermodynamic gate requires that the effective free energy and dissociation constant meet minimum binding strength criteria, ΔG\_"eff" \^∘ (x)≤ΔG\^"\\\" or equivalently K\_d\^"eff" (x)≤K\_d\^"\\\" . Third, an immunogenicity gate requires that the calibrated probability exceed a threshold, I ̂(x)≥I\^"\\\" . Let the total number of candidates be N, with M peptides passing all three filters. In abstract quantum terms, a uniform superposition over all candidates is ∣Ψ\_0⟩=1/√N ∑\_(j=1)\^N▒〖∣j⟩,which can be decomposed into "marked" and "unmarked" subspaces as ∣Ψ\_0⟩=sin⁡θ" "∣Ψ\_"good" ⟩+cos⁡θ" "∣Ψ\_"bad" ⟩, where 〖sin⁡〗\^2 θ=M/N. A Grover-like amplitude amplification operator G is defined as the product of an oracle O that flips the phase of marked states and a diffusion operator D that reflects about ∣Ψ\_0⟩. After r iterations, the state becomes ∣Ψ\_r⟩=G\^r∣Ψ\_0⟩=sin⁡((2r+1)θ)∣Ψ\_"good" ⟩+cos⁡((2r+1)θ)∣Ψ\_"bad" ⟩, and the probability of measuring a marked index is P\_r=〖sin⁡〗\^2 ((2r+1)θ).

When θ is small (few good candidates), the optimal number of iterations that maximizes P\_r is approximately r\_"opt" ≈π/4 √(N/M), but in the NISQ regime and in the presence of uncertainty in M, COLONYVAQ uses a small number of iterations (typically one to three) to reliably amplify the weight of marked peptides without over-rotation. In practice, this Grover-style step is simulated or approximated in a manner compatible with available hardware and serves to focus GMP peptide synthesis on a compact, high-confidence subset.

Within the set of marked peptides, residual ties are broken using a composite score S(x)=αK\_q (x,P)+β" " σ" ⁣" ((I ̂(x)-I\^"\\\" )/τ\_I )+γ" " σ" ⁣" ((K\_d\^"\\\" -K\_d\^"eff" (x))/τ\_K ), where K\_q (x,P)=〖∣⟨ψ(x)∣ψ(P)⟩∣〗\^2, τ\_I and τ\_K set the steepness of transitions, and σ is the logistic function. This expression makes explicit how similarity to known positive controls, modeled immune potency, and predicted binding strength jointly determine the final ranking used to define the COLONYVAQ-CRC peptide cargo for each patient.

Rationale for Combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX and Nivolumab

Oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines are standard components of adjuvant therapy in stage III colorectal cancer and can induce immunogenic cell death, increasing the release of tumor antigens and danger signals, which in turn enhances dendritic cell activation and antigen cross-presentation. Nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks blocks PD-1, preventing exhaustion and functional suppression of vaccine-induced and chemotherapy-released tumor-specific T cells. The quantum-classical COLONYVAQ-CRC engine is intended to maximize the quality of neoantigen targets; immunogenic chemotherapy increases antigen availability; and PD-1 blockade sustains T-cell effector function. The early phase I trial will test the safety and feasibility of this three-component strategy in the adjuvant MRD setting and generate preliminary immune and molecular response data.

Eligibility

  • Eligibility
  • Inclusion Criteria
    • \*\Diagnosis / Histology\\
    • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum.
    • Pathology report available for central or sponsor review (if requested), including:
    • Primary tumor site (colon vs rectum)
    • Grade of differentiation
    • Resection margins
    • \\Stage and Surgical Status\\
    • Pathologic stage III disease (any T, N1-2, M0) per AJCC 8th edition.
    • R0 resection of the primary tumor documented by operative and pathology reports (no macroscopic or microscopic residual tumor at margins).
    • No evidence of distant metastatic disease (M1) on staging imaging (CT chest/abdomen/pelvis ± MRI/PET per institutional standard) within a protocol-defined window (e.g., ≤8 weeks prior to enrollment).
    • Enrollment and treatment initiation planned within a protocol-defined timeframe after surgery (e.g., 4-12 weeks post-resection), allowing appropriate recovery.
    • \\Molecular Subtype (MSS/pMMR)\\
    • Tumor confirmed MSS or pMMR by local testing using one or more of the following:
    • IHC for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2
    • PCR-based MSI panel
    • NGS-based MSI/MMR assessment
    • No evidence of dMMR/MSI-H status or POLE ultramutated phenotype.
    • \\High-Risk Recurrence Profile\\
    • At least one protocol-defined high-risk feature, including one or more of the following:
    • Pathologic T4 tumor
    • Pathologic N2 nodal status (≥4 positive lymph nodes)
    • Positive postoperative ctDNA (MRD) by a validated tumor-informed assay within a protocol-defined window after surgery/chemotherapy initiation
    • Other protocol-specified high-risk features (e.g., lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, poorly differentiated histology, inadequate lymph node sampling), as defined in the protocol/statistical analysis plan
    • \\Suitability for Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy\\
    • Candidate for oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy with one of the following:
    • mFOLFOX6 every 14 days for \~6 months, \\or\\
    • CAPOX (XELOX) every 21 days for \~3-6 months
    • Chemotherapy regimen (mFOLFOX6 vs CAPOX) determined before enrollment and recorded as a stratification factor.
    • No contraindications to oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, or capecitabine (e.g., severe DPD deficiency; prior severe 5-FU/capecitabine toxicity).
    • \\Suitability for Nivolumab\\
    • Eligible in the investigator's judgment to receive anti-PD-1 therapy (nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks), including:
    • No history of severe (Grade ≥3) immune-related adverse events from prior immunotherapy
    • No active autoimmune disease requiring systemic immunosuppression
    • \\Performance Status\\
    • ECOG performance status 0-1 at screening.
    • \\Adequate Organ and Marrow Function\\ (documented within 14 days prior to enrollment; no transfusions/growth factors solely to meet eligibility)
    • \\Hematologic\\
    • ANC ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L
    • Platelets ≥ 100 × 10⁹/L
    • Hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 g/dL (transfusions allowed if clinically indicated, but not solely to qualify)
    • \\Hepatic\\
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × ULN (≤3 × ULN allowed for known Gilbert's syndrome if direct bilirubin is normal)
    • AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 × ULN
    • Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 × ULN (higher thresholds may be allowed for non-malignant causes per protocol)
    • \\Renal\\
    • Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 × ULN \\or\\ creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault or institutional standard)
    • \\Biospecimen Availability (COLONYVAQ)\\
    • Adequate tumor tissue available from resected primary tumor (and/or metastases if applicable), including one of the following:
    • Fresh frozen tissue (preferred), \\or\\
    • FFPE block(s), \\or\\
    • ≥15 unstained slides (or equivalent) suitable for DNA/RNA extraction
    • Matched normal sample (peripheral blood) available for germline DNA sequencing.
    • Willingness to provide additional blood samples for ctDNA, immune monitoring, and exploratory assays per schedule.
    • Pre-existing WES/RNA-seq may be accepted if meeting COLONYVAQ requirements per protocol.
    • \\Neoantigen Suitability\\
    • At least one predicted high-quality tumor neoantigen identified by the COLONYVAQ pipeline meeting prespecified criteria, including:
    • Strong predicted binding to patient-specific HLA alleles (e.g., Kd in an established binder range)
    • Evidence of tumor RNA expression of the source gene/allele
    • Prioritization by multi-algorithm immunogenicity scoring and passage through COLONYVAQ quantum-geometric, thermodynamic, and immunogenicity gates
    • \\OR\\
    • Availability of pre-manufactured GMP-grade neoantigen peptides with demonstrated in vitro immunogenicity and acceptable safety profile.
    • \\Life Expectancy\\
    • Investigator-estimated life expectancy ≥ 3 years in the absence of CRC recurrence.
    • \\Contraception and Pregnancy\\
    • \\Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP)\\
    • Negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 7 days prior to randomization
    • Agreement to use highly effective contraception during treatment and for a protocol-defined period after last dose (e.g., 5 months after last nivolumab and 6 months after last chemotherapy, or per label/institutional guidance)
    • \\Men with partners of childbearing potential\\
    • Agreement to use effective contraception and avoid sperm donation during treatment and for the protocol-defined period after last dose
    • \\Informed Consent and Compliance\\*
    • Able to understand and voluntarily sign written informed consent.
    • Willing and able to comply with all study procedures (visits, imaging, blood draws, follow-up).
  • Exclusion Criteria
    • \*\Residual or Metastatic Disease at Baseline\\
    • R2 resection or indeterminate margins not clearly R0.
    • Radiologic or histologic evidence of distant metastases (M1) at baseline staging (e.g., liver, lung, peritoneum).
    • Gross residual disease at the primary site.
    • \\Mismatch Repair-Deficient / MSI-High / POLE-Ultramutated Disease\\
    • Known dMMR/MSI-H CRC or POLE ultramutated tumors for which checkpoint inhibition is standard/preferred.
    • \\Prior Anticancer Therapy (Beyond Allowed Neoadjuvant)\\
    • Prior systemic therapy for metastatic CRC.
    • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy that:
    • Was not completed within protocol-defined windows, \\or\\
    • Led to unresolved Grade ≥2 non-hematologic toxicity (excluding alopecia or clinically insignificant neuropathy, per protocol)
    • Prior tumor vaccine targeting TAAs or neoantigens (peptide, DC, viral, RNA, or DNA).
    • Prior immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4).
    • \\Active or Uncontrolled Infections\\
    • Systemic infection requiring IV or oral antimicrobials that would interfere with study treatment per investigator judgment.
    • Uncontrolled HIV (e.g., CD4 below protocol threshold or unsuppressed viral load).
    • Active hepatitis B with HBV DNA above predefined limit, or active hepatitis C with detectable HCV RNA not adequately treated.
    • Other clinically significant infections posing excessive risk with immunotherapy, vaccine, or chemotherapy.
    • \\Autoimmune Disease / Immunosuppression\\
    • Severe/uncontrolled autoimmune disease requiring systemic immunosuppression (e.g., high-dose corticosteroids, biologics), including (examples):
    • Systemic lupus erythematosus
    • Inflammatory bowel disease with recent flares
    • Rheumatoid arthritis requiring biologics
    • Multiple sclerosis
    • Myasthenia gravis
    • Exceptions may include (per protocol):
    • Stable autoimmune thyroiditis on replacement therapy
    • Vitiligo
    • Well-controlled type 1 diabetes
    • Chronic systemic corticosteroids \>10 mg prednisone equivalent daily (or other immunosuppressants) within a protocol-defined window prior to first dose (unless physiologic/adrenal replacement).
    • \\Transplant History\\
    • Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
    • Prior solid organ transplantation (e.g., kidney, liver, heart).
    • \\Hypersensitivity / Drug Intolerance\\
    • Severe hypersensitivity (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any of the following:
    • COLONYVAQ-CRC components (peptides/excipients)
    • Poly I:C or similar TLR agonists
    • Nivolumab or other anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents
    • Oxaliplatin, 5-FU, leucovorin, or capecitabine (including severe DPD deficiency)
    • \\Concurrent Malignancy\\
    • Active second primary malignancy requiring systemic therapy or expected to require systemic therapy during the trial.
    • Exceptions:
    • Adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin carcinoma
    • Cervical carcinoma in situ
    • Other malignancies in complete remission not expected to relapse or require systemic therapy within 5 years, per investigator judgment
    • \\Significant Comorbidities\\
    • Clinically significant/unstable cardiovascular disease, including:
    • MI within 6 months
    • Unstable angina
    • Uncontrolled arrhythmias
    • CHF NYHA class III-IV
    • Uncontrolled hypertension despite medical therapy
    • Stroke or TIA within 6 months (if risk is increased per investigator judgment).
    • Severe COPD or interstitial lung disease with significant impairment, or prior pneumonitis requiring systemic steroids.
    • Any other serious uncontrolled condition (e.g., poorly controlled diabetes, severe cirrhosis, advanced renal failure) that may compromise safety or adherence.
    • \\Pregnancy / Lactation\\
    • Pregnant at screening (positive pregnancy test).
    • Breastfeeding (must discontinue lactation before first dose).
    • \\Concurrent Investigational Agents / Confounding Therapies\\
    • Participation in another interventional trial with systemic investigational agents (unless sponsor/IRB-approved and not confounding).
    • Live attenuated vaccine within a protocol-defined period (e.g., 30 days) prior to first dose of nivolumab or COLONYVAQ-CRC, or during study treatment.
    • \\Other Conditions Affecting Compliance or Assessment\\*
    • Psychiatric illness, cognitive impairment, substance abuse, or social situation limiting adherence to study requirements.
    • Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, makes the participant unsuitable or interferes with interpretation of safety, immunologic, or clinical outcomes.

Study details
    Colorectal Cancer Metastatic
    Colorectal Cancer Stage III
    Colorectal Cancer Stage IV

NCT07328087

Biogenea Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

1 February 2026

Step 1 Get in touch with the nearest study center
We have submitted the contact information you provided to the research team at {{SITE_NAME}}. A copy of the message has been sent to your email for your records.
Would you like to be notified about other trials? Sign up for Patient Notification Services.
Sign up

Send a message

Enter your contact details to connect with study team

Investigator Avatar

Primary Contact

  Other languages supported:

First name*
Last name*
Email*
Phone number*
Other language

FAQs

Learn more about clinical trials

What is a clinical trial?

A clinical trial is a study designed to test specific interventions or treatments' effectiveness and safety, paving the way for new, innovative healthcare solutions.

Why should I take part in a clinical trial?

Participating in a clinical trial provides early access to potentially effective treatments and directly contributes to the healthcare advancements that benefit us all.

How long does a clinical trial take place?

The duration of clinical trials varies. Some trials last weeks, some years, depending on the phase and intention of the trial.

Do I get compensated for taking part in clinical trials?

Compensation varies per trial. Some offer payment or reimbursement for time and travel, while others may not.

How safe are clinical trials?

Clinical trials follow strict ethical guidelines and protocols to safeguard participants' health. They are closely monitored and safety reviewed regularly.
Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.