Image

Selective Total Mesorectal Excision Based on Intra-Operative Frozen Section From Local Excision in Rectal Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Selective Total Mesorectal Excision Based on Intra-Operative Frozen Section From Local Excision in Rectal Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Recruiting
18-75 years
All
Phase N/A

Powered by AI

Overview

This study is a prospective, single-arm, phase II superiority trial to determine whether a selective organ-preserving strategy based on immediate intra-operative frozen-section results can achieve favorable 2-year local control while lowering morbidity in patients with low rectal cancer (tumor ≤5 cm from the anus) who have a near clinical complete response (near-cCR) or partial response (residual tumor \<2 cm) after radiation therapy.

Population: Adults with primary rectal adenocarcinoma located ≤5 cm from the anal verge who, after neoadjuvant radiotherapy, are judged to have near-cCR or partial response (residual tumor \<2 cm).

Intervention: All participants undergo local excision under general anesthesia. The specimen is sent for intra-operative frozen section.

ypT0-1 on frozen section → procedure concluded; patient enters watch-and-wait. ypT2-3 or R1 on frozen section → immediate completion total mesorectal excision (TME).

Frozen-section ypT1-2 but final paraffin section up-staged to ypT2-3 or R1 → elective TME within 8 weeks.

Primary Endpoint: a composite outcome of 2-year local recurrence rate, surgical complications (≤30 days), and long-term functional impairment (anorectal, urogenital, and quality-of-life scales).

Secondary Endpoints: Agreement between intra-operative frozen-section pathology and final paraffin-section pathology, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), 3-year overall survival (OS), surgery-sparing rate, post-operative recovery metrics, Quality-of-life scores.

Estimated Enrollment: 27 participants.

Description

Rectal cancer is a major global health burden with high morbidity and mortality. Its prognosis is generally worse than that of colon cancer, largely because of a higher risk of local recurrence. In 1982, Bill Heald introduced total mesorectal excision (TME), which has since proven to markedly reduce local recurrence. Peri-operative radiotherapy and chemotherapy further improve outcomes; pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is superior to post-operative CRT, cutting local relapse by \~50%. Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines therefore recommend "pre-operative concurrent CRT followed by radical surgery" for locally advanced (stage II/III) rectal cancer. More recently, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has refined this strategy, increasing pathologic complete response (pCR) rates to 20-40 %, and up to 60 % when combined with immunotherapy.

After neoadjuvant treatment, approximately 20 % of tumors achieve complete regression with pCR. If pre-operative assessment shows a clinical complete response (cCR), these patients may be offered an organ-preserving "watch-and-wait" approach instead of immediate TME, preserving sphincter function and quality of life. Since Habr-Gama's first report, multiple studies have confirmed the safety of this strategy: among patients managed by watch-and-wait, 15-20 % develop regrowth, 95 % of which are local and salvageable; 3-year distant-metastasis rates are only 8 % and 5-year cancer-specific survival is 94 %. Consequently, watch-and-wait is now standard for patients with cCR after CRT.

However, only 10-20 % of patients who ultimately achieve pCR are judged cCR pre-operatively. Imaging or endoscopic uncertainties (e.g., minimal ulceration) often lead to classification as partial response (PR) or near-cCR, depriving these patients of organ preservation. Traditionally, such patients proceed directly to TME. An emerging alternative is "local excision ± salvage TME": trans-anal full-thickness excision is performed first; if final pathology shows ypT0-1, no further surgery is required, whereas ypT2-3 or R1 margins trigger elective salvage TME. This risk-stratified approach aims to preserve organs in good responders while ensuring oncologic safety in poor responders.

Yet the GRECCAR-2 trial raised concerns: prior local excision may complicate subsequent TME, compromise sphincter preservation, and increase peri-operative morbidity (bleeding, infection, anorectal dysfunction) and long-term functional impairment. For patients with excellent tumor regression after CRT, these risks pose a dilemma.

To address this challenge, we propose the present clinical study, evaluating whether intra-operative frozen-section guidance during local excision can maintain diagnostic accuracy and oncologic safety while reducing the surgical complications and long-term functional sequelae associated with deferred TME.

This study is a prospective, single-arm, phase II superiority trial to determine whether a selective organ-preserving strategy based on immediate intra-operative frozen-section results can achieve favorable 2-year local control while lowering morbidity in patients with low rectal cancer (tumor ≤5 cm from the anus) who have a near clinical complete response (near-cCR) or partial response (residual tumor \<2 cm) after radiation therapy.

Population: Adults with primary rectal adenocarcinoma located ≤5 cm from the anal verge who, after neoadjuvant radiotherapy, are judged to have near-cCR or partial response (residual tumor \<2 cm).

Intervention: All participants undergo local excision under general anesthesia. The specimen is sent for intra-operative frozen section.

ypT0-1 on frozen section → procedure concluded; patient enters watch-and-wait. ypT2-3 or R1 on frozen section → immediate completion total mesorectal excision (TME).

Frozen-section ypT1-2 but final paraffin section up-staged to ypT2-3 or R1 → elective TME within 8 weeks.

Primary Endpoint: a composite outcome of 2-year local recurrence rate, surgical complications (≤30 days), and long-term functional impairment (anorectal, urogenital, and quality-of-life scales).

Secondary Endpoints: Agreement between intra-operative frozen-section pathology and final paraffin-section pathology, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), 3-year overall survival (OS), surgery-sparing rate, post-operative recovery metrics, Quality-of-life scores.

Estimated Enrollment: 27 participants.

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma.
  2. Neoadjuvant therapy based on radiotherapy; post-radiotherapy evaluation ≥8 weeks later shows near clinical complete response (near-cCR) or partial response (PR) with residual tumor \<2 cm.
  3. Tumor distance from the anal verge ≤5 cm.
  4. Age 18-75 years.
  5. No synchronous multiple primary cancers.
  6. No contraindications to pre-operative radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
  7. Adequate organ function (cardiac, hepatic, renal, hematologic).
  8. Patient or legally authorized representative able to understand the study protocol, willing to participate, and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age \<18 or \>75 years.
  2. Concurrent or previous malignancy within the past 5 years (except adequately treated basal-cell or squamous-cell skin carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix).
  3. Emergency surgery required for bowel obstruction, perforation, or bleeding.
  4. Prior colorectal surgery that may compromise intestinal reconstruction.
  5. Need for en-bloc multivisceral resection.
  6. ASA physical status IV or V.
  7. Pregnant or lactating women.
  8. a) Women of child-bearing potential with a positive serum pregnancy test at baseline or who have not undergone pregnancy testing; post-menopausal women must have been amenorrheic for ≥12 months.
  9. b) Men or women of reproductive potential unwilling to use effective contraception throughout the study period.
  10. Severe psychiatric illness precluding informed consent or compliance.
  11. Severe COPD, interstitial lung disease, or ischemic heart disease precluding safe surgery.
  12. Continuous systemic corticosteroid therapy within 1 month before enrolment.
  13. Contraindications to laparoscopic surgery.
  14. Patient or legally authorized representative unable to understand the study conditions and objectives.

Study details
    Rectal Cancer Patients

NCT07337811

Sun Yat-sen University

31 January 2026

Step 1 Get in touch with the nearest study center
We have submitted the contact information you provided to the research team at {{SITE_NAME}}. A copy of the message has been sent to your email for your records.
Would you like to be notified about other trials? Sign up for Patient Notification Services.
Sign up

Send a message

Enter your contact details to connect with study team

Investigator Avatar

Primary Contact

  Other languages supported:

First name*
Last name*
Email*
Phone number*
Other language

FAQs

Learn more about clinical trials

What is a clinical trial?

A clinical trial is a study designed to test specific interventions or treatments' effectiveness and safety, paving the way for new, innovative healthcare solutions.

Why should I take part in a clinical trial?

Participating in a clinical trial provides early access to potentially effective treatments and directly contributes to the healthcare advancements that benefit us all.

How long does a clinical trial take place?

The duration of clinical trials varies. Some trials last weeks, some years, depending on the phase and intention of the trial.

Do I get compensated for taking part in clinical trials?

Compensation varies per trial. Some offer payment or reimbursement for time and travel, while others may not.

How safe are clinical trials?

Clinical trials follow strict ethical guidelines and protocols to safeguard participants' health. They are closely monitored and safety reviewed regularly.
Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.