Description

Ischemic stroke is one of the leading causes of disability and death worldwide. While cerebral middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction constitutes approximately 10% of all ischemic, it is a life-threatening medical emergency causing a mass effect with substantial rise in intracranial pressure and reduction of cerebral blood flow. The letality of malignant MCA-infarction under conservative treatment lies around 70%, wherefore a surgical treatment is important in these patients. In the past years, there have been several randomized controlled trials (DESTINY, DECIMAL, HAMLET) focussing on the decompressive hemicraniectomy (DC) in malignant MCA infarction. Those studies have shown the superiority of DC compared to medical management in higher rate of survival and favorable outcome measured by modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Consequently, the DC is recommended as a life-saving treatment in the American Stoke Association for patients under 60 years of age. Further, the DESTINY II trial could show the beneficial effect of DC in patients over 60 years of age as well, wherefore the age alone is not a cut-off line anymore to indicate a surgical treatment.

Despite this life saving measure, there are several sequelae of DC to consider. Patients who have survived usually undergo a second surgery to close the skull defect by cranioplasty. As previous study reported, the surgical procedure of cranioplasty inherits a high complication rate up to 34% including infection, wound impairment, intracranial hemorrhage and aseptic necrosis. Further, DC can cause a syndrome of the trephined or hydrocephalus which is associated with additional risk for patient and increased cost for the community.

Recently, investigator´s research group performed a multicentric study across academic hospitals in Germany including over 500 patients with cerebellar infarction. As a subgroup analysis, investigators compared the functional outcome in these cohorts considering different surgical treatment strategies: craniotomy+necrosectomy versus DC. According to this study, craniotomy + necrosectomy was superior in higher rate of favorable outcome at discharge and at 3 months follow-up compared to DC. This result is supported by a recent systematic review and meta-analysis by Ayling et al. as well. In line with this, resection of infarcted frontal/temporal lobe has been proposed as surgical alternative to DC in malignant MCA-infarction (defined as "strokectomy", "necrosectomy"). In a recent systematic review and meta analysis, there was a clear trend towards higher favorable outcome in necrosectomy group compared to DC group (mRS 0-3: 58.5% vs 39.4%) with malignant MCA-infarction, however, further clinical studies are needed for more evidence concerning the specific surgical method to integrate in the clinical routine.

Pathophysiologically, it has been shown that the neuroinflammatory cascade ensue during ischemic stroke. Experimental and clinical studies support the existence of inflammatory area surround the initial lesion in the subacute phase of ischemic stroke, which was defined as "inflammatory penumbra". Cellar death occurs in this region with triggering cytotoxic T-cells resulting in increased cell death and cytotoxic edema. This phenomenon might have contributed to the superior functional results observed in the necrosectomy group in ischemic stroke, but this hypothesis has to be proved in the future studies.

Thus, the general aims are to evaluate the functional outcome of malignant MCA-infarction treated either by necrosectomy or DC in an international, multicentric large cohort of patients. Prior to this study, the aim of current study is to perform a pilot study performing necrosectomy in malignant MCA-infarction to proof the feasibility of the intervention.