Description

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences of the University of Porto (Ref. 023/07-17).

The curriculum and assessment approach of "Parents as Partners" is built on a 5-domain risk and protective model: Parents as Individuals- Their health, mental health and general well-being; Parent-Child Relationships- Fathers' and mothers' age-appropriate parenting strategies; Couple Relationship- How parents manage their conflict and disagreement; coparenting that is more collaborative than undermining; Family of Origin Patterns- Parents' developmental histories with their parents; what is carried over from the past; how to interrupt intergenerational cycles of harsh treatment, abuse, and neglect; Stressors and Supports- Parents' strategies for coping with external stressors and enlisting support from family, friends, the workplace, and social services. The sessions will be led by two psychologists (male and female) who underwent 24-hour training by the Brazelton Touchpoints Center. The program has a 10-dimension fidelity assessment model, which will be complemented by session checklists. Furthermore, the facilitators will participate in weekly monitoring sessions with professionals specialized in the program.

Participants will be recruited from nurseries and private clinics.

After enrolling in the program, group facilitators conduct an initial interview to get to know the couple and clarify any questions they may have about the program. At this moment, couples will be asked to sign a consent form. After consenting to their participation, couples will be randomly assigned to one of two conditions: intervention group or waitlist-control group. The estimated sample size is 51 couples for the waitlist-control and intervention group each (power of .80; α = .05; G*Power 3.1.9.7). Participants will be assessed before and after the intervention on (co)parental, dyadic and work-family interface dimensions. Parents in the waitlist-control group will receive the intervention once their participation in the study is finished and if positive outcomes are found.

Hypotheses Group effects: The intervention group (IG) is expected to show an increase in coparenting relationship quality, parenting efficacy, and a decrease in parental stress compared to the wait-list control group (CG). Additionally, the investigators expect fathers in the IG to show an increase in parental involvement compared to those in the CG. As for secondary outcomes, the IG is expected to show an increase in the quality of the couple relationship, partner responsiveness and family-work enrichment, and a decrease in family-work conflict compared to the CG. Additionally, the researchers expect an improvement in child's social and emotional development.

Actor and partner effects: The improvement in parental indicators (e.g., parenting efficacy, parental stress) is expected to impact one's parental involvement and the partner's perception of partner responsiveness and coparenting relationship quality.

Statistical procedures: Intent to treat analysis will be applied. All data will be included regardless of participation rate. Repeated measures MANCOVA will be used to address within and between effects of the intervention, alongside T-Tests for comparing IG and CG, and controlling for mental health. The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model will be applied to assess actor and partner effects using Hierarchical Linear Modeling.

To assess the perceived usefulness of the intervention, 6-10 couples from the IG will be interviewed together using a semi-structured script after the posttest survey is completed. These interviews will be conducted by a researcher who has not been involved in the implementation of the program.

Participants data will be stored in an encrypted file, saved on a computer, and only accessible to the main researchers of this study. Confidentiality will be guaranteed by attributing an individual code to each participant/couple. Interviews will be recorded and transcribed and transcriptions will be marked with the same code to ensure the association of the collected data.