Image

The Role of Quantitative CT and Radiomic Biomarkers for Precision Medicine in Pulmonary Fibrosis

The Role of Quantitative CT and Radiomic Biomarkers for Precision Medicine in Pulmonary Fibrosis

Recruiting
40-101 years
All
Phase N/A

Powered by AI

Overview

This observational study involves obtaining 2 chest CT scans; a historical baseline CT within ±1 year of enrollment into PRECISIONS, and a follow-up CT (either historical or prospective) 12 months ± 180 days after the baseline CT. Many IPF patients will have a CT scan every 12 months for disease monitoring and cancer screening. Participants will have the option to share historical CTs only or they can choose to have a research CT done for the follow-up scan, if a scan for clinical purposes is not available.

Description

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains deadly despite two FDA-approved therapies. Forced vital capacity (FVC), a one-dimensional assessment of lung function that requires three effort-dependent and error-prone maneuvers, is the standard for evaluating disease severity and monitoring progression. FVC indirectly measures disease activity and is thus insensitive to subtle change. These limitations hamper therapeutic trials. The Gender, Age, and Physiology (GAP) score improves on FVC alone and is the most used scoring model for prognostication, but gender and age aren't influenced by treatment. Modifiable intermediate molecular markers and other metrics for assessing disease severity and progression remain unmet needs for aiding drug development and clinical decision-making. Computed tomography (CT) captures morphologic patterns and the extent of fibrosis noninvasively. Advances in quantitative CT enable objective detection and quantitation of anatomy, and highly dimensional image features, often termed radiomic, can identify sub-visual characteristics. The investigators seek to evaluate radiomic features alone and in conjunction with other disease dimensions for prognostication and response to treatment in IPF.

The investigators overall objectives are to identify and validate radiologic features, such as total extent of lung fibrosis, for disease activity and intermediate response to therapy, and understand where to position these powerful markers. The investigators hypothesize that DTA scores will contribute to prediction of disease progression and that molecular markers will enhance that performance.

Aim 1: The investigators will validate quantitative CT and radiomic markers for disease progression by independent replication in separate cohorts. The investigators hypothesize that quantitative CT markers will predict disease progression in UVA/Chicago cohorts. Baseline and subsequent CT scans have been voluntarily collected in many PFF-PR cases. The investigators propose collection of 1-year HRCTs in UVA/Chicago participants to evaluate: a) the prognostic value of baseline quantitative CT and radiomic markers (i.e. DTA) in predicting time to progression defined as either 10% relative decline in FVC, lung transplant, or death from any cause, b) associations between changes in CT biomarkers on sequential CT and changes in 1-year FVC and DLCO, and c) change in CT associated with drug treatment. This aim will establish the relative and synergistic value of CT to established physiologic markers.

Aim 2: The investigators will determine if candidate genetic variants for IPF susceptibility and survival are associated with the DTA score and improve predictive performance for survival. The investigators hypothesize that variants in MUC5B, TOLLIP, and Telomere lengths (TL) will enhance DTA fibrosis score associations with progression-free survival in IPF. The investigators will perform a cross-sectional analysis of PFF-PR cases comparing quantitative CT and radiomic markers at baseline with and without "at risk" genotypes for association with severity and progression (decline in FVC over time). This will ascertain what markers improve performance of the DTA fibrosis extent scores using Cox regression analysis and accuracy metrics from Aim 1. Findings will be replicated in UVA/Chicago cohort and in the prospective PRECISIONS cohort. This aim will establish the additive value of genetic markers.

Aim 3: The investigators will assess whether DTA and radiomic markers are additive/synergistic with plasma protein and blood transcriptome markers for disease progression. The investigators hypothesize that selected protein and transcriptomic markers will prove additive to DTA fibrosis extent for prediction of progression-free survival whereas other markers correlated with DTA will not. The investigators have chosen published markers from a 4-protein panel signature, along with CCL18, as examples, given their current level of replication and promise. The investigators will also include a 25-gene FVC predictor for disease progression. Similar analyses, as outlined in Aims 1 and 2, will determine their additive information value.

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥ 40 years of age
  2. Diagnosed with IPF according to 2018 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT confirmed by the enrolling investigator
  3. Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant
  2. Women of childbearing potential not willing to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use two adequate methods of contraception, including at least one method with a failure rate of <1% per year during study participation*
  3. Significant medical, surgical or psychiatric illness that in the opinion of the investigator would affect subject safety or potential to complete the research study
    • A woman is considered to be of childbearing potential if she is post-monarchical, has not reached a postmenopausal state (≥ 12 continuous months of amenorrhea with no identified cause other than menopause), and has not undergone surgical sterilization (removal of ovaries and/or uterus).

Examples of contraceptive methods with a failure rate of <1% per year include bilateral tubal ligation, male sterilization, established and proper use of hormonal contraceptives that inhibit ovulation, hormone-releasing intrauterine devices, and copper intrauterine devices.

Study details
    Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

NCT06323876

University of Virginia

15 October 2025

Step 1 Get in touch with the nearest study center
We have submitted the contact information you provided to the research team at {{SITE_NAME}}. A copy of the message has been sent to your email for your records.
Would you like to be notified about other trials? Sign up for Patient Notification Services.
Sign up

Send a message

Enter your contact details to connect with study team

Investigator Avatar

Primary Contact

  Other languages supported:

First name*
Last name*
Email*
Phone number*
Other language

FAQs

Learn more about clinical trials

What is a clinical trial?

A clinical trial is a study designed to test specific interventions or treatments' effectiveness and safety, paving the way for new, innovative healthcare solutions.

Why should I take part in a clinical trial?

Participating in a clinical trial provides early access to potentially effective treatments and directly contributes to the healthcare advancements that benefit us all.

How long does a clinical trial take place?

The duration of clinical trials varies. Some trials last weeks, some years, depending on the phase and intention of the trial.

Do I get compensated for taking part in clinical trials?

Compensation varies per trial. Some offer payment or reimbursement for time and travel, while others may not.

How safe are clinical trials?

Clinical trials follow strict ethical guidelines and protocols to safeguard participants' health. They are closely monitored and safety reviewed regularly.
Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.