Description

Aim of the the work The aim of this study is to estimate the efficacy of Hemodialysis alone for uric acid clearance in patients on hemodialysis. In order to evaluate the need of adjuvant uric acid lowering therapy

Patients And Methods

1. Type of The study:

Prospective cross-sectional study.

2. Place of the study:

Sohag University Hospital, department of Internal Medicine and hemodialysis unit.

3. Ethical aspect:

Informed Written consent will be taken from all patients to include their data in the study, the research will be approved by medical ethics committee of Faculty of Medicine, Sohag university

Patients

Inclusion criteria:

• We included all consenting adults aged 18 or older, on maintenance hemodialysis for at least 3 consecutive months receiving 2 to 3 sessions weekly.

Exclusion criteria:

• Patients aged < 18 years old .
• Patients on recent hemodialysis less than 3 months.
• We excluded patients who were on Uric acid lowering therapy (UALT).
• Patients received less than 4 hours of hemodialysis and those who had emergency dialysis.

Number of Patients:

The study will include 100 hemodialysis patients for duration of 6 months.

• Methods We carried out a prospective cross-sectional study at the Hemodialysis unit in Sohag University Hospital . Patients included in the study dialyzed with the Fresenius® 4008S generator (Fresenius Medical Care, St. Wendel, Germany) dialyzers , with a polysulfone synthetic dialysis membrane and bicarbonate dialysate.

The size of the dialysis membrane was estimated according to the total body surface of the patient . Membranes sizes FX60 were used for a body surface of approximately (1.2-1.5 m2 ) ; whereas FX80 between (1.6 and 1.8m2 ) and FX100 were used for body surfaces above 1.8m2.

Dialysis adequacy was calculated from the formula Kt/ V urea; K being the clearance of urea given by the dialyzer, t the duration of the dialysis session (4 h) and V the distribution volume of urea [10].

Uric acid clearance (UAc) was estimated using the formula: UAc=100 x (SUA levels before HD-SUA levels after HD) / SUA levels before HD] [14]. We defined two thresholds values for UAc (65 and 80%).

A Hemodialysis session was considered to be of low efficacy if below 65% of reduction, moderate efficacy between 65 and 80% and a good efficacy above 80% of UAc . [15].

These predictors will be included:

1. Gender.
2. Age.
3. Underlying nephropathy.
4. Average time on renal replacement therapy.
5. Comorbidities,
6. Residual renal function (< 100 ml/24 or ≥ 100 ml/24 h) of participants.
7. Current hemodialysis session parameters such as vascular access.
8. Duration of the session.
9. Time interval between the current and previous dialysis session.
10. Body mass index (BMI).
11. Blood pressure at the beginning and at the end of dialysis
12. Dialysis adequacy.
13. Blood flow (< 300ml/min or>300ml/min).
14. Serum uric acid level which were assessed on a peripheral blood sample collected 5 min before and after dialysis.

Statistical analysis

• All collected data will be analyzed and correlated.
• All the statistical analysis will be done by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) version20.
• Baseline data and patient characteristics will be presented using descriptive statistics, for example, number, percentage, mean and standard deviation.