Description

Muscle weakness in the trunk; reducing the support of children with CP, may cause increased distal tone and decreased function in their daily practices. When the effectiveness of interventions that can improve postural control is evaluated, trunk-focused training is one of the 5 interventions supported by a moderate level of evidence. In an intervention study where trunk training was structured individually, there may be an improvement in erector spinae muscle group scores when evaluated with sEMG. A study of 28 cases, including all subtypes of CP, aimed to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of Spinal Mouse (SM) and the effect on the spinal column with 4 hours a day, 1 week of intensive clinical rehabilitation application. In this population, SM was evaluated with therapeutic interventions, it has been reported that it may show significant posture differences, especially in total spinal inclination and spine length. In children aged 5-12 years with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Level 1, 2 CP, there are significant improvements in the Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) score after only Trunk Focused Rehabilitation (TFR). It is emphasized that with TFR, which is described as a unique approach, postural control of the whole body can be improved by the use of intermediate postures and postural activities involving the trunk and better participation of the affected muscles. Only after TFR intervention, the findings of improvement in the assessments on a 3D force platform were highlighted in postural sway, early sternal and sacral decelerations. It is carried out with active participation, individualized, intensive, and time-limited, considering possible content limitations and the needs and preferences of the adolescent and the family. It is stated that trunk-targeted interventions can be given together with conventional physical therapy programs to support functional improvements.