Image

Shockwave Lithoplasty Compared to Cutting Balloon Treatment in Calcified Coronary Disease - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Shockwave Lithoplasty Compared to Cutting Balloon Treatment in Calcified Coronary Disease - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Recruiting
21 years and older
All
Phase N/A

Powered by AI

Overview

The Short-Cut trial is a prospective, investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that is designed to compare the efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty vs. intravascular lithotripsy prior to drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with moderate to severely calcified coronary arteries.

Description

The trial will be composed of two cohorts:

  • Patients treated with up-front rotational atherectomy
  • Patients in whom atherectomy is not planned

Randomization to either cutting balloon angioplasty or intravascular lithotripsy will occur as follows in the 2 cohorts:

  • After rotational atherectomy is safely completed In the rotational atherectomy arm
  • After safe and successful wire crossing in patients in whom atherectomy is not planned.

The trial is designed to demonstrate non-inferiority between cutting balloon angioplasty and intravascular lithotripsy in each cohort with regards to the primary endpoint of post-procedural stent area as measured by intravascular imaging at the site of maximal calcification.

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Subject is > 21 years old 2. Subject with an indication for PCI for the treatment of a) stable coronary artery disease; b) unstable angina; or c) NSTEMI with evidence of down-trending biomarkers 3. Subject is willing and able to provide informed written consent Angiographic Inclusion Criteria
    1. The target lesion is a de novo native coronary lesion
    2. The target vessel is a native coronary artery with either:
      1. A stenosis > 70%; or,
      2. A stenosis > 50% and <70% with evidence of ischemia via either positive stress test, FFR value < 0.80 or RFR/iFR/DFR value < 0.89
    3. The reference diameter of the target vessel is > 2.5mm and < 4.0 mm at the

      lesion site

    4. The target lesion has evidence of significant calcium at the lesion site defined either as,
      1. The presence of radiopacities involving both sides of the arterial wall > 5mm and involving the target lesion on angiography
      2. the presence of > 270o arc of superficial calcium on intravascular imaging with a length > 5mm or the presence of 360o arc of superficial calcium

        Exclusion Criteria:

    5. Patient is pregnant
    6. Patient is actively participating in another clinical trial
    7. Known LVEF < 25%
    8. Ongoing Non-STEMI with rising biomarkers
    9. Cardiogenic shock or requirement for mechanical/pharmacologic hemodynamic support
    10. Planned use in the randomized lesion of a bare metal stent or non-stent treatment only
    11. Patient has a known allergy to contrast which cannot be adequately pre-treated
    12. Patient has a history of bleeding or coagulopathy and is unable to receive blood transfusion if needed
    13. Patient presents with STEMI
    14. Patient is unable to tolerate dual anti-platelet therapy
    15. Patient has suffered a recent cerebrovascular event (stroke/TIA) within last 30 days

      Angiographic Exclusion Criteria

    16. Presence of large thrombus in the target vessel
    17. Inability to pass coronary guidewire across the lesion
    18. The target vessel has excessive tortuosity (Defined as presence of 2+ bends > 90o or 3+ bends > 75o) or other anatomic considerations that precludes intravascular imaging
    19. The target lesion is within a coronary artery bypass graft
    20. The target lesion involves a bifurcation lesion in which either a 2-stent strategy is planned or both branches are planned for calcium modification
    21. Coronary artery disease that requires surgical revascularization
    22. Angiographic or imaging evidence of dissection in the target vessel prior to randomization
    23. Investigator feels there is not equipoise regarding the treatment strategy

Study details
    Treatment in Calcified Coronary Disease

NCT06089135

Baim Institute for Clinical Research

15 October 2025

Step 1 Get in touch with the nearest study center
We have submitted the contact information you provided to the research team at {{SITE_NAME}}. A copy of the message has been sent to your email for your records.
Would you like to be notified about other trials? Sign up for Patient Notification Services.
Sign up

Send a message

Enter your contact details to connect with study team

Investigator Avatar

Primary Contact

  Other languages supported:

First name*
Last name*
Email*
Phone number*
Other language

FAQs

Learn more about clinical trials

What is a clinical trial?

A clinical trial is a study designed to test specific interventions or treatments' effectiveness and safety, paving the way for new, innovative healthcare solutions.

Why should I take part in a clinical trial?

Participating in a clinical trial provides early access to potentially effective treatments and directly contributes to the healthcare advancements that benefit us all.

How long does a clinical trial take place?

The duration of clinical trials varies. Some trials last weeks, some years, depending on the phase and intention of the trial.

Do I get compensated for taking part in clinical trials?

Compensation varies per trial. Some offer payment or reimbursement for time and travel, while others may not.

How safe are clinical trials?

Clinical trials follow strict ethical guidelines and protocols to safeguard participants' health. They are closely monitored and safety reviewed regularly.
Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.