Overview
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how well two community-based self-management programs work in people with chronic back or neck pain from populations that have been minoritized based on race, ethnicity, or income. The main question it aims to answer is:
How well does a community-based self-management program teaching mind-body skills such as mindfulness and cognitive behavioral approaches (Partners4Pain) work for reducing pain intensity and interference with general activities and enjoyment of life compared to a community-based self-management program focused on general health and wellbeing (Keys to Wellbeing)?
Participants will be asked to do the following:
- Attend 2 screening visits to learn about the study and see if they meet the requirements to participate.
- Be randomly assigned to one of the two community-based self-management programs.
- Attend 9 weekly self-management program sessions (90 minutes each)
- Complete surveys about their pain and overall health at 2 months (after the programs end), 4 months, and 6 months.
Funding for the project is provided through the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) through the NIH HEAL Initiative (https://heal.nih.gov/), R33AT012309.
Description
This project is a full-scale, multi-level randomized hybrid effectiveness implementation trial (n=376) of 'Partners4Pain', a community supported self-management program for individuals with back pain (back or neck pain) from populations who experience health disparities (BP-PEHD). Partners4Pain will be compared to an active control, Keys to Wellbeing. Both programs were optimized and feasibility tested in an earlier R61 pilot study of 51 individuals minoritized by race, ethnicity, or income (NCT05786508).
Aims for the hybrid effectiveness implementation trial are:
AIM 1. To assess the relative effectiveness of Partners4Pain versus Keys to Wellbeing in terms of:
- Primary effectiveness outcomes of pain intensity and interference over 6 months using bi-monthly assessments.
- Secondary effectiveness outcomes of pain impact, self-efficacy and other HEAL outcomes.
AIM 2. To assess the impact of health disparity factors on the effectiveness of Partners4Pain for primary and secondary outcomes through subgroup analyses which account for potential complexities between disparity factors.
AIM 3. To describe important disparity mitigating and implementation related measures that can impact and inform sustained translation of the program with community partner organizations.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- Self-reported chronic back pain (defined as pain in the low or mid back, or neck pain) which has lasted for 3 months or longer
- Score of 3 or higher on the self-reported Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity scale (PEG scale - 0-10)
- Member of one or more of the following NIH-designated health disparity populations: American Indian/Alaska Native; Asian; Black/African American; Hispanic/Latino; Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders; Socioeconomically disadvantaged (annual household income less than $50,000)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe unmanaged mental illness
- Self-reported cancer with active treatment involving radiation or chemotherapy.
- Dementia - Mini Mental State Exam score of 23 or lower for those with suspicion of cognitive impairment
- Self-reported pregnancy