Image

'Thrombectomy in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism - Device Versus Thrombolysis Netherlands': TORPEDO-NL

'Thrombectomy in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism - Device Versus Thrombolysis Netherlands': TORPEDO-NL

Recruiting
18 years and older
All
Phase N/A

Powered by AI

Overview

TORPEDO-NL will be an investigator-initiated, academically sponsored, multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) require immediate reperfusion therapy on top of anticoagulation. The standard reperfusion treatment in these patients is full-dose systemic thrombolysis. This carries a significant risk of major bleeding (10-25%) and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH, 3%). Catheter-directed thrombectomy (CDT) is a promising alternative to systemic thrombolysis with a more direct effect on reducing pulmonary artery clot burden and very likely a better safety profile. Randomized trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of CDT in high-risk patients are currently unavailable. The investigators hypothesize that in high-risk PE patients, CDT is superior to the current standard of systemic thrombolysis in terms of mortality and adverse events, i.e., is associated with a lower composite incidence of all-cause mortality, treatment failure, major bleeding and all-cause stroke. The investigators also hypothesize that CDT will lead to a shorter length of stay (LOS) at the intensive care unit (ICU) and in-hospital, faster recovery, and better long-term quality of life (QoL).

Objective: To determine whether CDT in high-risk PE relative to systemic thrombolysis is:

  • more effective and safer in terms of a reduction of the composite endpoint on all-cause mortality and adverse events defined as treatment failure, major bleeding and all-cause stroke at day 30 (primary outcome)
  • leads to a better Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) at day 7
  • associated with a lower level of oxygen supplementation at 48 hours
  • associated with shorter length of stay (LOS) at the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the hospital
  • associated with better functional recovery as well as better patient-reported outcomes such as QoL at one year
  • cost-effective after a time horizon of one year

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients with confirmed acute PE, i.e. contrast filling defect in a lobar or more proximal pulmonary artery on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), and/or obstructive shock with echocardiographic confirmed dilatation of the right ventricle and a congested vena cava inferior, both with/without echocardiographic signs of clot in transit or deep vein thrombosis of the leg.
  2. High risk for mortality, i.e.
    1. post cardiac arrest (after temporary need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation), OR
    2. obstructive shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg and signs of end-organ hypoperfusion (e.g. elevated lactate levels >2 mmol/l) or the need for vasopressors (adrenalin or noradrenalin) to maintain an adequate blood pressure), OR
    3. persistent hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or systolic blood pressure drop ≥40 mmHg for at least 15 minutes) not caused by new onset arrhythmia, hypovolemia, or sepsis, OR
    4. abnormal RV function on transthoracic echocardiography or CTPA AND elevated cardiac troponin levels AND respiratory failure defined as hypoxemia (SaO2 <90%) refractory to O2 supplementation by nasal cannula or Venturi mask, requiring full face mask O2 supplementation (100% FiO2), high-flow nasal O2, or (non-)invasive mechanical ventilation.
  3. CDT available and technically feasible so as to allow for a randomization-to-needle

    time of 60 minutes or less.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. "Catastrophic PE", i.e. ongoing cardiac arrest and/or need for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and/or immediate indication for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as judged by the responsible physician(s)
  2. Glascow Coma Scale <8 following resuscitation for cardiac arrest
  3. Alternative diagnosis than acute PE contributing largely to the acute hemodynamic and/or respiratory failure, e.g. sepsis, COPD GOLD 3 or 4, or known heart failure with NYHA Functional Classification of 4, as judged by the treating physician.
  4. A known "do not admit to the ICU" or "do not resuscitate" directive
  5. An absolute contraindication to systemic thrombolysis, i.e.
    • History of hemorrhagic stroke
    • Ischemic stroke in past 6 months
    • Central nervous system neoplasm
    • Major trauma, major surgery or major head injury in past 3 weeks (note: mild external laceration of the head after, e.g. syncope, does not count as major head injury, especially when a CT scan of the head shows no hematoma)
    • Active bleeding, life-threatening or into a critically organ/area; OR known severe bleeding diathesis with previous bleeding fulfilling these criteria
  6. Reperfusion therapy (systemic thrombolysis, surgical thrombectomy or CDT/other

    catheter directed therapy), or placement of a non-retrieved inferior vena cava filter for acute pulmonary embolism in the past 3 months

  7. Thrombus in transit through a patent foramen ovale.
  8. Known chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), or strong suspicion of CTEPH based on pre-existing clinical findings and combinations of signs of PE chronicity on echocardiography and/or CTPA.
  9. Known hypersensitivity to systemic thrombolysis, heparin, or to any of the excipients
  10. If, in the Investigator's opinion, or after consultation with the local PERT-team or EC-members, the patient is not appropriate for thrombectomy
  11. Chronic use of full-dose oral or parenteral anticoagulation before presentation.
  12. Pregnancy
  13. Current participation in another study that would interfere with participation in this study
  14. Previous enrolment in this study
  15. Refusal of deferred consent by the next of kin or by the patient himself to use the data. Deferred consent will not be asked to relatives of patients who die in scene, but are included in the study.

Study details
    Pulmonary Embolism Acute

NCT06833827

Leiden University Medical Center

16 September 2025

Step 1 Get in touch with the nearest study center
We have submitted the contact information you provided to the research team at {{SITE_NAME}}. A copy of the message has been sent to your email for your records.
Would you like to be notified about other trials? Sign up for Patient Notification Services.
Sign up

Send a message

Enter your contact details to connect with study team

Investigator Avatar

Primary Contact

  Other languages supported:

First name*
Last name*
Email*
Phone number*
Other language

FAQs

Learn more about clinical trials

What is a clinical trial?

A clinical trial is a study designed to test specific interventions or treatments' effectiveness and safety, paving the way for new, innovative healthcare solutions.

Why should I take part in a clinical trial?

Participating in a clinical trial provides early access to potentially effective treatments and directly contributes to the healthcare advancements that benefit us all.

How long does a clinical trial take place?

The duration of clinical trials varies. Some trials last weeks, some years, depending on the phase and intention of the trial.

Do I get compensated for taking part in clinical trials?

Compensation varies per trial. Some offer payment or reimbursement for time and travel, while others may not.

How safe are clinical trials?

Clinical trials follow strict ethical guidelines and protocols to safeguard participants' health. They are closely monitored and safety reviewed regularly.
Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.