Overview

The present study aims to compare the radiographic success of endodontic treatment using Orstavik's criteria between two sealers: AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) and Neosealer Flo (Avalon Biomed, Bradenton, Florida, USA), as well as between two obturation techniques: continuous wave and single cone. The study includes 270 patients, with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Clinical and radiographic variables will be assessed, including quality of obturation, lesion healing, and restoration. The study seeks to determine if the use of bioceramic sealer is effective regardless of the obturation technique used, highlighting the importance of clinical follow-up to evaluate endodontic treatment success.

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients aged 18 years and older. Teeth with a diagnosis of pulpal necrosis or irreversible pulpitis. Informed consent provided for data usage.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with systemic conditions that may impair healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression).
• Teeth with root fractures, resorption, or open apices.
• Incomplete clinical or radiographic records.
• Cases with poor-quality radiographs or lack of standardization for evaluation