Description

Chronic post-herniorrhaphy inguinal pain (CPIP) after inguinal hernia surgery significantly affects quality of life and daily activities. The incidence of this condition ranges from 15% to 53% and its management is often challenging. CPIP is defined as pain lasting more than three months and can be diagnosed if no organic cause can be found to explain the pain at the end of this period. There are various methods in the treatment of CPIP, including medical therapy, nerve blocks and surgical intervention.

The inguinal region is mainly innervated by the ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) nerves. These nerves are the most commonly damaged structures after inguinal hernia surgery.

However, the II and IH nerves can be easily blocked in isolation throughout their entire course in the groin area or in the abdominal wall at different injection sites using fascial plane blocks such as transversalis fascia plan block (TFP). These blocks are frequently preferred because of their ease of application and wide analgesic effects. Therefore, studies investigating the efficacy of fascial blocks that provide ease of application are increasing.

Although TFP and II-IH blocks have been used in the treatment of acute postoperative inguinal pain, they have been used in a limited number of studies for CPIP; however, no study has compared the efficacy and advers effect rates of these methods.

The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of these two treatment modalities. The secondary aim is to determine the incidence of adverse events associated with US-guided TFP and II-IH nerve block therapy. A total of at least 80 patients will be enrolled for comparison, 40 patients in each group. The NRS score will be compared both within and between groups before, 1 month after and 3 months after treatment.