Description

The inestigators conducted a forward-looking, single-center pilot study with a follow-up period of 8 weeks. The study recruited 66 patients diagnosed with patellofemoral pain (PFP) by a professional sports physician at the Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, between January and September 2023. The study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital. Although this is a pilot study, the inestigators strictly followed the CONSORT guidelines. All participants signed an informed consent form and completed home rehabilitation interventions.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria During the trial, an investigator not involved in the study used an electronically generated random sequence to assign patients to three groups. Two professional physical therapists (N.C and S.R) were responsible for assessing and supervising the accuracy of the project and were unaware of the grouping details.

Interventions After randomization, participants received a package containing two wearable motion sensors, a charger, resistance bands, and a manual. Additionally, the rehabilitation software provided lectures and Q&A sessions related to the condition, accessible via Android or iOS platforms. All data collected by the sensors were strictly encrypted to protect patient information and privacy. Each participant was assigned a therapist for home rehabilitation support, and a follow-up function via the software or telephone was used to remind patients who missed three remote rehabilitation sessions.

Before starting home rehabilitation, patients attended a briefing at the hospital. Participants were divided into three groups: Group 1 received 1 face-to-face remote rehabilitation tutorial (OST), Group 2 received 3 face-to-face remote rehabilitation tutorials (TST), and Group 3 received 6 face-to-face remote rehabilitation tutorials (SST). Each session lasted 40 minutes and was conducted three times a week (on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday). Following the briefing, patients performed home remote rehabilitation training on the same day, with each session lasting 40 minutes. The remote rehabilitation program included muscle strengthening, flexibility stretching, and movement quality training.

Primary Outcome The primary outcome was assessed by the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS) 6 weeks after completing the rehabilitation guidance. The scale consists of Part A, which directly assesses adherence (including 6 questions, each with 5 options, scoring from 0 to 4), and Part B, which assesses reasons affecting adherence (including 10 questions, each with 5 options, scoring from 0 to 4). Items with positive phrasing were reverse scored, so a higher overall adherence score indicates better exercise adherence.

Secondary Outcomes Secondary outcomes were collected at the hospital 8 weeks after the start of the study, including knee pain severity assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (ranging from 0 "no pain" to 10 "worst pain"); isokinetic concentric and eccentric peak torque of the quadriceps muscle reflecting knee joint muscle strength; Kujala Patellofemoral Score (0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating better knee function); and the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), which measures the severity of fatigue in patients with various conditions and its impact on activities and lifestyle (including 9 questions, each scored from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue). Additionally, after completing the remote rehabilitation program, the inestigators conducted a qualitative research questionnaire to explore potential strategies to improve adherence.