Overview
This study aims to compare the postoperative outcomes of low rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) versus traditional Pfannenstiel extraction.
Description
Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) in colorectal surgery allows the extraction of the surgical specimen through the anal orifice. Several studies demonstrated improved postoperative pain, bowel movements, patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction, and psychological wellbeing after NOSE compared with traditional Pfannenstiel extraction. However, most of these studies focused on colon surgery. The aim of this retrospective propensity score matched study is to investigate the postoperative outcomes of NOSE in low rectal cancer surgery, classified according to the English National Low Rectal Cancer Development Programme (LOREC).
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing low anterior resection with Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for low rectal cancer between January 2017 and January 2023
- Patients with rectal cancer classified as "low" according to the English National Low Rectal Cancer Development Programme (LOREC)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing non-restorative procedures
- Patients undergoing immediate or delayed handsewn coloanal anastomosis
- Patients undergoing planned open surgery or unplanned conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery
- Patients with a concomitant diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)