Image

RESistance of IgA Nephropathy to Conventional and Newly-approved Therapies: an Observational, Real-life Study (RESIGAN)

RESistance of IgA Nephropathy to Conventional and Newly-approved Therapies: an Observational, Real-life Study (RESIGAN)

Recruiting
18 years and older
All
Phase N/A

Powered by AI

Overview

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide, characterized by glomerular mesangial IgA deposits, often with IgG and C3. Despite its prevalence, the pathophysiology of IgAN is poorly understood. The prognosis varies significantly, from benign hematuria to rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, potentially leading to end-stage renal disease within months. The MEST-C classification enhances prognosis characterization and informs integrated scoring systems; however, while useful for assessing overall prognosis, these scores do not reliably predict treatment responses and are unvalidated for IgA vasculitis nephritis. Given the disease's heterogeneity, treatment options for IgAN, with or without vasculitis, are controversial. Nephroprotective strategies that lower intraglomerular pressure through RAS blockade are essential in managing IgAN. Steroids are considered for rapidly progressive cases, yet their effectiveness in persistent proteinuria despite optimized nephroprotection is debated. Other immunosuppressive therapies, such as B cell targeting and complement inhibition, are under investigation. Recently developed nephroprotective strategies, including SGLT2 inhibitors and endothelin-1 receptor antagonists, may significantly influence future therapeutic approaches. Although available in many European countries, their real-world effectiveness has not been evaluated. Identifying factors linked to persistent proteinuria and renal dysfunction despite optimized nephroprotection is a critical unmet need. We hypothesize that innovative nephroprotective strategies will reduce the risk of persistent proteinuria and renal dysfunction in an IgAN cohort.

Description

IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) is the most prevalent primary glomerulonephritis globally, diagnosed by detecting mesangial IgA deposits in the kidneys, often accompanied by IgG and C3. The disease's pathophysiology remains unclear despite its commonality. Prognosis can vary widely, from benign hematuria to rapidly progressive forms leading to end-stage renal disease within months. The MEST-C classification provides histological prognostic factors that enhance prognosis assessment and facilitate the development of integrated scoring systems. However, these scores are limited in predicting treatment responses and lack validation for IgA vasculitis nephritis.

Given the disease's heterogeneity, treatment strategies for IgAN are contentious. Nephroprotective approaches focusing on reducing intraglomerular pressure through RAS blockade play a significant role in management. Steroids are suggested for rapidly progressive disease, but their effectiveness in persistent proteinuria, despite optimized nephroprotection, is debated. Other treatments, including B cell-targeting therapies and complement inhibition, are under investigation. Recent advances in nephroprotection, such as SGLT2 inhibitors and endothelin-1 receptor antagonists, could significantly reshape future therapeutic strategies. While these treatments are widely available in Europe, their real-world effectiveness remains to be evaluated. Identifying factors linked to persistent proteinuria and renal dysfunction despite optimized strategies is a pressing unmet need.

This study hypothesizes that new nephroprotective strategies will influence the risk of persistent proteinuria and renal dysfunction in a real-life cohort of IgAN patients.

Primary Objective: To identify clinical, biological, and histological risk factors for persistent proteinuria and renal dysfunction in IgAN patients.

Secondary Objectives include:

Identifying risk factors for steroid therapy response. Evaluating responses to nephroprotective therapies, including SGLT2 inhibition. Analyzing responses to immunosuppressive therapies at various time points post-diagnosis.

Assessing risk factors for persistent proteinuria and renal dysfunction in patients with related conditions or IgA vasculitis.

Identifying risk factors for adverse events following nephroprotection or immunosuppressive therapies.

Describing treatment trajectories since IgAN diagnosis. Validating the International IgA Nephropathy prediction tool. Developing a cohort of IgAN patients will facilitate reliable epidemiological data collection and allow for the evaluation of responses to contemporary treatments, identifying patients with treatment resistance in real-life scenarios. This identification is critical for establishing early, efficient therapeutic strategies for IgAN patients at risk of progression.

Study Design: A prospective and retrospective observational cohort study.

Inclusion Criteria:

Adult patients aged ≥ 18 years. Renal biopsy after 2017 confirming IgA deposits for IgAN diagnosis (index date).

Informed consent from patients who do not object to data use. Non-inclusion Criteria: None.

Cohort Details:

Retrospective Cohort: Expected 600 patients, inclusion from 01/01/2017 to study start date.

Prospective Cohort: 200 participants over 2 years, followed for 2 years, totaling 4 years of research.

For retrospective data collection, information notes will be mailed to patients, allowing data use after one month without opposition. Prospective patients will receive study information during clinic visits, with data used if there is no objection. Data will be extracted from medical records, including clinical, histological, and laboratory results, collected by clinical research assistants or investigators. Patient Health Information (PHI) will be stored securely, with only month and year of birth recorded for privacy.

Analysis: For primary outcomes, univariable analysis will utilize logistic regression to explore the association of risk factors with outcomes. A multivariable model may be developed based on expert knowledge and univariable results. The model's performance will be assessed via the area under the curve (AUC) and R², with bootstrap validation to evaluate for overfitting.

Total Research Duration: 4 years, with a recruitment period of 2 years and a follow-up period of 2 years. The retrospective data will cover at least 2 years post-IgAN diagnosis, potentially extending up to 12 years based on the biopsy date (from 2017).

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient: age ≥ 18 years
  • Renal biopsy performed after 2017 showing IgA deposits leading to the diagnosis of IgAN (the date of diagnosis being the index date)
  • Informed patient and who does not object to the use of his data

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study details
    IgA Nephropathy (IgAN)

NCT06926244

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

29 July 2025

Step 1 Get in touch with the nearest study center
We have submitted the contact information you provided to the research team at {{SITE_NAME}}. A copy of the message has been sent to your email for your records.
Would you like to be notified about other trials? Sign up for Patient Notification Services.
Sign up

Send a message

Enter your contact details to connect with study team

Investigator Avatar

Primary Contact

  Other languages supported:

First name*
Last name*
Email*
Phone number*
Other language

FAQs

Learn more about clinical trials

What is a clinical trial?

A clinical trial is a study designed to test specific interventions or treatments' effectiveness and safety, paving the way for new, innovative healthcare solutions.

Why should I take part in a clinical trial?

Participating in a clinical trial provides early access to potentially effective treatments and directly contributes to the healthcare advancements that benefit us all.

How long does a clinical trial take place?

The duration of clinical trials varies. Some trials last weeks, some years, depending on the phase and intention of the trial.

Do I get compensated for taking part in clinical trials?

Compensation varies per trial. Some offer payment or reimbursement for time and travel, while others may not.

How safe are clinical trials?

Clinical trials follow strict ethical guidelines and protocols to safeguard participants' health. They are closely monitored and safety reviewed regularly.
Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.