Image

Single Time Point Prediction as Earlier Diagnosis of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis

Single Time Point Prediction as Earlier Diagnosis of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis

Recruiting
18 years and older
All
Phase N/A

Powered by AI

Overview

This study is a prospective observational study for subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or non-IPF interstitial lung diseases (ILD).

The purpose of this study is to compare whether imaging patterns from high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) at baseline can predict worsening. Single Time point Prediction (STP) is a score derived from an artificial intelligenc/ machine learning (AI/ML) using the radiomic features from a HRCT scan that quantifies the imaging patterns of short-term predictive worsening.

Description

Primary objective is to predict early for progression in both IPF and non-IPF ILD population using an artificial intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning (ML) algorithm of STP score. The primary interest is to validate STP score in identifying a cohort early for the candidate of anti-fibrotic treatment. The study plans to collect clinical information such as pulmonary function tests (PFT), symptom scores, 6-minute walk tests (6MWT), and radiologic information from HRCT. This study does not intervene with patient's standard medical care.

This proposal is a prospective study that will enroll patients from the UCLA ILD Center. STP scores of subjects' baseline HRCT images will be grouped to one of 2 arms based on the baseline HRCT.

  • Arm A: STP>=30% in whole lung
  • Arm B: STP < 30% in whole lung

A subject's allocation will be determined by the baseline HRCT scan. STP score will be derived from the baseline HRCT to compare the early prediction of progression in ILD, STP of 30% threshold is expected to be close to the mean of overall population. In addition, a multi-scale guided attention (MSGA) is an imaging marker from deep learning model with two attention models to classify an IPF-likeliness using HRCT.

In IPF, progression-free survival (PFS) is defined by the reduction of 10% or more by FVC in volume or 15% or more by DLCO (DLCO) or death from any cause, whichever came first.

In non-IPF ILD, PFS is defined by two worsening outcomes out of three elements of PFT worsening, radiological worsening or symptom or disease-related death alone.

  • Worsening in PFT is defined by 5% or more absolute decreases in the percent predicted FVC or 10% or more absolute decrease in the percent predicted DLCO.
  • Radiological evidence of disease progression is defined by visual worsening (one or more of the following) from a radiological report or quantitative lung fibrosis (QLF) changes >=2% in whole lung
  • Symptomatic worsening can be measure by the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea scale or King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD).

Secondary outcomes of this study are:

  • To compare overall survival between the two arms of STP
  • To compare the changes in 6-minute walk tests between the two arms of STP
  • To compare PFS between two groups of MSGA marker positive and negative
  • To compare overall survival between two groups of MSGA marker positive and negative

With a chronic ILD or IPF, lung function may be stable for a few years or continue to deteriorate slowly or rapidly develop more scar tissues over time. While it is known that age, biological sex, and lung function are factors that can impact risk of worsening lung function, there is a great need for better methods to predict which patients are at risk of worsening lung function. Having better methods to predict disease progression could allow more timely treatment with anti-fibrotic treatment to prevent the disease progression.

In both IPF and non-IPF ILD, HRCT scan is required for diagnosis. Imaging patterns derived from HRCT, called STP is designed to predict the areas in lung that may be likely to progress in the next 6 to 12 months. High STP scores are associated with poor prognosis and worsening the pulmonary function. The goal of this study is to test whether an AI-algorithm, the STP score from a single CT study, can predict disease progression in subjects with IPF and non IPF-ILD in a prospective study. This AI-algorithm was developed under NIH-sponsored study.

The purpose of prospective observational cohort study from UCLA is to test for the early sign of progressive fibrosis using baseline HRCT. This study, Imaging Signature of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis (IS-PPF) Research is a prospective study that will collect information regarding HRCT images, pulmonary function test, 6-minute walk, symptomatic score, and patients' clinical information to set up AI-driven imaging signature for evaluating the STP in predicting progression in IPF and non-IPF ILD.

This is an observational study; only minimally invasive procedures will be performed with study subjects (blood draws and nasal swabs). These biological samples will support future research studies. The study subject's will participation in the study for up to 3 years, the length of participation may vary. All subjects will continue to receive their usual care and treatment.

In summary, this research will create an opportunity to test and validate the imaging score and early prediction for IPF and non-IPF ILD that can impact current and future care practices.

Eligibility

IPF Inclusion Criteria:

  • Established a diagnosis (within 3 years) of IPF by enrolling center as defined by ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT criteria
  • Age over or equal to 40 years old
  • No history of lung transplant
  • FVC % predicted >= 45%
  • DLCO % predicted >=25%

Non-IPF ILD Inclusion Criteria:

  • Established a diagnosis (within 3 years) of non-IPF ILD by enrolling center.
  • Age over or equal to 18 years old
  • Presence of chronic fibrosis ILD defined as architectural distortions with reticulation and the presence of traction bronchiectasis estimating visually >10% in whole lung.
  • FVC % predicted >= 45%
  • DLCO % predicted >=25%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned to participate in an intervention trial within the next 3 months
  • Currently listed for lung transplantation at the time of enrollment
  • Malignancy, treated or untreated, other than skin cancer or prostate cancer within the past 5 years
  • Exclusion of co-morbidities: congestive heart failure (stroke, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction), current virus-associated community acquired pneumonia, smoking-related chronic obstructive lung disease with FEV1 < 70%, history of lung cancer, history of other cancer treated within the past 4 years (excluding basal cell carcinoma of skin).

HRCT data from subjects with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) can be collected.

Major Discontinuing Criteria in this study

  • lung transplant after baseline or death
  • withdraw of consent or transition to another care center

Study details
    Pulmonary Fibrosis

NCT06162884

University of California, Los Angeles

25 April 2025

Step 1 Get in touch with the nearest study center
We have submitted the contact information you provided to the research team at {{SITE_NAME}}. A copy of the message has been sent to your email for your records.
Would you like to be notified about other trials? Sign up for Patient Notification Services.
Sign up

Send a message

Enter your contact details to connect with study team

Investigator Avatar

Primary Contact

  Other languages supported:

First name*
Last name*
Email*
Phone number*
Other language

FAQs

Learn more about clinical trials

What is a clinical trial?

A clinical trial is a study designed to test specific interventions or treatments' effectiveness and safety, paving the way for new, innovative healthcare solutions.

Why should I take part in a clinical trial?

Participating in a clinical trial provides early access to potentially effective treatments and directly contributes to the healthcare advancements that benefit us all.

How long does a clinical trial take place?

The duration of clinical trials varies. Some trials last weeks, some years, depending on the phase and intention of the trial.

Do I get compensated for taking part in clinical trials?

Compensation varies per trial. Some offer payment or reimbursement for time and travel, while others may not.

How safe are clinical trials?

Clinical trials follow strict ethical guidelines and protocols to safeguard participants' health. They are closely monitored and safety reviewed regularly.
Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.