Image

High-dose Inhalations of Nitric Oxide in the Treatment of Pneumonia

Recruiting
18 years of age
Both
Phase N/A

Powered by AI

Overview

This is a multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial. At least 2 but no more than 5 centers are expected to participate in the study.

The primary objective is to test the hypothesis that the addition of high-dose inhaled nitric oxide therapy to standard treatment has a positive effect on the clinical course of pneumonia and the structure and function of cardiopulmonary system.

Number of participants: 200, including the subproject NO-PNEUMONIA-CAP - 100 CAP participants, the subproject NO-PNEUMONIA-NP - 100 NP participants.

Number of groups: 4 Inhalation of iNO at a dose of 200 ppm for 30 minutes under the control of methemoglobin level (no more than 5%) three times a day if the patient is allocated to the main group. The general course of iNO therapy will last until the pneumonia resolves, but no more than 7 days. Recording of vital signs and safety assessment will be carried out immediately before the initiation of NO therapy and every 15 minutes after its start (pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate, SpO2, temperature, MetHb level).

Description

Principal investigator: T.P. Kalashnikova, MD, PhD. Sub-investigators: N.O.Kamenshchikov, MD, PhD, I.V. Kravchenko, MD, Yu.A. Arsenyeva, MD, Yu.K. Podoksenov, MD, PhD, DMedSci, M.S. Kozulin, MD, M.B. Gorchakova, MD, B.N. Kozlov, MD, PhD, DMedSci, A.A. Boshchenko, MD, PhD, DMedSci.

RESEARCH RELEVANCE Pneumonia remains one of the most common infectious respiratory diseases worldwide. Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is defined as pneumonia that is acquired outside the hospital or diagnosed in the first 48 hours from hospitalization. Nosocomial pneumonia (NP) is diagnosed in individuals with symptoms of the disease that develop 48 hours or more after the patient's hospitalization. The most common causative agents of CAP are S. pneumoniae, M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae, H. influenza, as well as viruses and microbial associations. In recent years, there has been an increase in the resistance of CAP pathogens to antibiotics of the group of aminopenicillins, cephalosporins, and macrolides.

In the etiological structure of NP, the leading role belongs to gram-negative microorganisms. The main pathogens are representatives of Enterobacteriaceae (including Klebsiella pneumoniae and E.coli), Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, characterized by a high level of resistance to antimicrobial drugs.

Considering the high prevalence of pneumonia, the continuous increase in the resistance of microorganisms to antimicrobial agents, the high mortality rate from adverse reactions caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria, the lack of development of new drugs with proven antibacterial effectiveness, and the high economic costs of treatment, it is urgent to search for alternative ways to increase efficiency in the treatment of pneumonia . From this point of view, the addition of inhaled high doses of nitric oxide (iNO) to standard antibacterial therapy seems promising.

The positive results of using NO have been proven in the treatment of patients with pulmonary hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and in the treatment of wound processes. There is a cardioprotective and nephroprotective effect of this molecule that has been described. In recent years, data have appeared on the successful use of iNO in the treatment of viral pneumonia, in particular in pneumonia caused by the Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2). High concentrations of nitric oxide cause cytotoxic, antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal effects.

The use of iNO for pneumonia is pathogenetically justified. It has a selective vasodilating effect on pulmonary blood vessels with no systemic effect on hemodynamics. By reducing vascular resistance in the ventilated areas of lungs, it improves ventilation-perfusion ratio and can increase systemic oxygenation, reduce pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction, and promotes the inclusion of previously unventilated alveoli in gas exchange.

The use of NO appears even more justified in the treatment of pneumonia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), since their lungs are subject to ischemia and reperfusion injury during CPB.

In recent years, more and more evidence has emerged that the mechanisms of antimicrobial action of NO differ from those of modern traditional antibiotics, which is most relevant in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria and polymicrobial infections.

The antibacterial effect of NO at a dose of 160 ppm (parts per million) and higher has been described for a number of microorganisms. The safety of using iNO for humans in doses of 160-200 ppm for 15-30 minutes 2 to 5 times a day has been demonstrated in a number of clinical studies with Mycobacterium abscessus, other complex clinical situations, in patients with cystic fibrosis, in pregnant women and newborns. In contrast to bacterial membranes sensitive to NO, the stability of membranes of epithelial cells and fibroblasts and the absence of cytolysis when exposed to nitric oxide 200 ppm 3 times a day was proven in experimental studies and on cells of living human tissues.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that the addition of high-dose inhaled nitric oxide therapy to standard treatment has a positive effect on the clinical course of pneumonia and the structure and function of cardiopulmonary system.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES

  • To assess the timing of resolution of pneumonia in the main (with iNO) and control (without iNO) groups
  • To assess differences in the dynamics of acute phase reactants in the main and control groups.
  • To assess differences in the X-ray of the lungs and its dynamics in the main and control groups.
  • To assess differences in variables of the functional state of the lungs and their dynamics according to spirometry and the 6-minute walk test under the influence of therapy in the main and control groups.
  • To study differences in the dynamics of the main variables of the structural and functional state of the heart during echocardiography in the main and control groups.

The effectiveness of the study will be assessed by such a concept as "end point".

The primary composite endpoint will be resolution of pneumonia. The term "resolution of pneumonia" will include three criteria: achieving an oxygenation index SpO2/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) >315; Respiratory Rate (RR)<20; discontinuation of antibacterial therapy.

Secondary hospital endpoints:

  1. Difference in the duration of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (fever, leukocytosis, a shift in the white blood cells (WBC) towards more immature cells, increased levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) in the study groups.
  2. Difference in the duration of respiratory support in the study groups.
  3. Difference in the frequency of changing antibacterial treatment regimens due to ineffectiveness in the compared study groups.
  4. Difference in the frequency of transfer of patients to non-invasive ventilation (NIV), mechanical ventilation in the study groups.
  5. Difference in the incidence of sepsis and septic shock in both groups.
  6. Difference in the frequency of decrease in oxygen saturation after 72 hours from the start of therapy below 95% with an initially normal level or by 3% or more with an initially reduced level in the main and control groups.
  7. Difference in the frequency of negative computer tomography (CT) dynamics after 72 hours of therapy in the study groups.
  8. Difference in the frequency of increase in right atrial and ventricle volume index and/or peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity and/or decrease in contractile function of the right ventricle after 72 hours of therapy and with the resolution of pneumonia in groups
  9. Difference in the distance traveled according to the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) with the resolution of pneumonia in the main and control groups.
  10. Difference in the frequency and severity of the development of ventilatory disorders during spirometry at the time of resolution of pneumonia in the main and control groups.
  11. Difference in scores according to EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire in the main and control groups.
  12. Difference in the percentage of mortality caused by pneumonia or its complications (sepsis, multiple organ failure, acute respiratory failure) in the compared groups.

The study will include patients who underwent cardiac surgery under CPB with NP diagnosed in the postoperative period, as well as patients hospitalized for CAP. Patients will be randomized into 4 groups:

Subproject NO-PNEUMONIA-NP Group 1, main group, n=50 Standard antibacterial therapy + NO 200 ppm 3 times a day for 30 minutes Group 2, control group, n=50, Standard antibacterial therapy Subproject NO-PNEUMONIA-CAP Group 3, main group, n=50 Standard antibacterial therapy + NO 200 ppm 3 times a day for 30 minutes Group 4, control group, n=50 Standard antibacterial therapy. A special device, which synthesizes nitric oxide from atmospheric air directly during therapy, will be used. The technology is based on the process of oxidation of atmospheric nitrogen in a nonequilibrium gas discharge plasma and is characterized by high operating accuracy and stable maintenance of NO concentration in the breathing mixture.

ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS Clinical effectiveness will be assessed daily with registration of data at control points (day of development of pneumonia, 72 hours from the onset of the disease, resolution of pneumonia) according to the dynamics of the temperature curve, oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate, oxygenation index SpO2∕FiO2, assessment of quality of life according to European Quality-of-Life-5 Dimension (EQ -5D-5L) questionnaire.

LABORATORY ASSESSMENT Laboratory effectiveness will be assessed by the levels of peripheral blood leukocytes, the significance of blood shift in the leukocyte formula, the dynamics of CRP, PCT (screening, 72 hours from the onset of the disease, resolution of pneumonia).

ASSESSMENT OF INSTRUMENTAL EFFICIENCY

  1. Distance traveled during the 6-minute walk test on the day the pneumonia resolved.
  2. Spirometry will be performed on the day of screening and on the day of resolution of pneumonia and include assessment of Vital capacity, Forced vital capacity, Forced expiratory volume in one second, Peak expiratory flow, Forced expiratory flow at 25% of Forced vital capacity (FVC), Forced expiratory flow at 50% of FVC, Forced expiratory flow at 75% of FVC.
  3. Chest CT scan on the day of screening, after 72 hours and on the day of resolution of pneumonia with determination of localization and size of consolidation, localization and size of the Ground-glass opacity, air bronchograms (yes/no), hemodynamic abnormalities (yes/no), fluid volume in the pleural cavities.
  4. Cardiac ultrasound will be performed on the day of screening, 72 hours later, and on the day of resolution of pneumonia and will include assessment of end-diastolic, end-systolic volume indexes and left ventricular ejection fraction, right ventricular antero-posterior diameter, right ventricular fractional area change, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) , tricuspid annular systolic velocity (S'), right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (if possible), diameter of the inferior vena cava and its collapse during inspiration, fluid in the pericardial cavity (yes/no, volume insignificant/moderate/severe/tamponade ) and pleural cavities.

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. An established diagnosis of Nosocomial Pneumonia (NP) after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) or hospitalization for Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
  2. Spontaneous breathing.
  3. Age > 18 years.
  4. Signed informed consent.
  5. Negative result of immunochromatographic Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 rapid antigen test on the day of diagnosis of pneumonia.
        Diagnostic criteria for NP The diagnosis of NP is considered established when the number of
        points on the
        Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) is greater than 6:
        Diagnostic criteria for CAP:
        Radiologically confirmed focal pulmonary opacity and at least 2 clinical symptoms and signs
        of the following:
          1. acute fever at the onset of the disease (t° > 38.0°C);
          2. cough with sputum;
          3. physical signs (crepitus/fine rales, bronchial breathing, shortening of percussion
             sound);
          4. leukocytosis > 10x109/l and/or left shift (> 10%)
        Exclusion Criteria:
          1. Diagnosed infectious process of another localization (surgical site infection (SSI),
             acute and chronic urinary tract infection (active), catheter-related bloodstream
             infection, peritonitis, infective endocarditis etc.).
          2. Mechanical ventilation
          3. Presence of tracheostomy
          4. Patient's participation in another clinical trial at the time of screening or within
             the previous 3 months.
          5. Concomitant pulmonary disease with the need for respiratory support before the
             development of pneumonia.
          6. History of malignancy or other irreversible diseases/conditions with a life expectancy
             of less than 1 year.
          7. Presence of HIV infection

Study details

Nosocomial Pneumonia, Community-acquired Pneumonia

NCT06170372

Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

16 February 2024

Step 1 Get in touch with the nearest study center
What happens next?
  • You can expect the study team to contact you via email or phone in the next few days.
  • Sign up as volunteer  to help accelerate the development of new treatments and to get notified about similar trials.

You are contacting

Investigator Avatar

Primary Contact

site

FAQs

Learn more about clinical trials

What is a clinical trial?

A clinical trial is a study designed to test specific interventions or treatments' effectiveness and safety, paving the way for new, innovative healthcare solutions.

Why should I take part in a clinical trial?

Participating in a clinical trial provides early access to potentially effective treatments and directly contributes to the healthcare advancements that benefit us all.

How long does a clinical trial take place?

The duration of clinical trials varies. Some trials last weeks, some years, depending on the phase and intention of the trial.

Do I get compensated for taking part in clinical trials?

Compensation varies per trial. Some offer payment or reimbursement for time and travel, while others may not.

How safe are clinical trials?

Clinical trials follow strict ethical guidelines and protocols to safeguard participants' health. They are closely monitored and safety reviewed regularly.
Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.