Image

A Randomized Trial of Prednisolone, Itraconazole, or Their Combination in Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis

A Randomized Trial of Prednisolone, Itraconazole, or Their Combination in Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis

Recruiting
18 years and older
All
Phase 3

Powered by AI

Overview

The investigators hypothesize that a combination of prednisolone and itraconazole would significantly reduce the exacerbation rate at one-year of patients with acute allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) compared to itraconazole or prednisolone monotherapy.

In this study, 300 subjects aged ≥18 years with acute ABPA will be randomized to treatment with either prednisolone, itraconazole, or prednisolone plus itraconazole, all for four months each. After collecting baseline demographic, immunologic, and imaging data, the investigators will follow the patients every 2 months for the first two visits and then every four months for three visits. The primary outcome will be the proportion of subjects experiencing exacerbation (asthma or ABPA) 12 months after treatment completion.

Description

The principles of treating ABPA include using glucocorticoids to control the immunologic activity and antifungal agents to attenuate the fungal burden in the airways.4 Glucocorticoids are the first line treatment in acute stages of ABPA, although there are no placebo-controlled trials of glucocorticoids in ABPA. However, their effectiveness in ABPA is so well established that it might be considered unethical to conduct placebo-controlled trials. In one study, 92 subjects were randomized to receive high-dose (n=44) or low-dose (n=48) prednisolone. The numbers of subjects with exacerbation after one year (high-dose: 40.9% vs. medium-dose: 50%, p=0.59) were similar in the two groups. Although the composite response rates were significantly higher in the high-dose group, the improvement in lung function and the time to first exacerbation were similar in the two groups. [Eur Respir J. 2016;47(2):490-498] Specific antifungal agents in ABPA can modify the immune response by removing or reducing the antigenic stimulus consequent to a decreased fungal burden. Two randomized trials have recently shown that itraconazole and voriconazole monotherapies are as effective as prednisolone in treating acute-stage ABPA. [Chest. 2018;153(3):656-664|Eur Respir J. 2018;52(3):1801159] In the first randomized trial, 131 ABPA patients were randomized to receive either oral itraconazole (400 mg/day, [n=68]) or prednisolone (n=63) for four months. The proportion of subjects responding at six weeks was significantly higher in the prednisolone arm (100% vs. 88%; p=0.007). However, the number of subjects with exacerbations after one and two years of treatment was similar in the two groups. The time to first exacerbation was also similar in the two groups. The occurrence of adverse reactions was significantly higher in the glucocorticoid arm. Although prednisolone was more effective than itraconazole in inducing a response in acute-stage ABPA, itraconazole with fewer side effects is an acceptable alternative for treating acute-stage ABPA.[Chest. 2018;153(3):656-664] In the second trial, 50 ABPA patients were randomized to receive prednisolone (n=25) or voriconazole (n=25).[Eur Respir J. 2018;52(3):1801159] The response to treatment after six weeks and three months was similar in the two groups. The numbers of subjects with exacerbations after one year and two years were similar in the two groups. More recently, acute-stage ABPA subjects were randomized to receive either prednisolone (n=94) or prednisolone-itraconazole combination (n=97). The one-year exacerbation rate was 33% and 20.6% in the prednisolone and the prednisolone-itraconazole arms, respectively (p=0.054).[Eur Respir J. 2022;59(4):2101787] However, the study did not have a comparator arm of itraconazole monotherapy. Thus, it is unclear whether combination therapy is better than itraconazole or prednisolone monotherapy in reducing the occurrence of ABPA exacerbations.

The investigators hypothesize that the combination of prednisolone and itraconazole would significantly reduce the exacerbation rate at one-year than monotherapy. This study will compare the efficacy of prednisolone, itraconazole, or their combination in patients with acute stages of ABPA.

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

        Consecutive subjects of acute stage allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA)
        complicating asthma per the revised ISHAM-ABPA working group criteria
          -  newly diagnosed subjects with uncontrolled asthma or symptoms or radiology suggesting
             active lesions attributable to ABPA and meeting the diagnostic criteria of ABPA
          -  those previously meeting the diagnostic criteria for ABPA and presenting with
             sustained (≥2 weeks) clinical or radiological worsening; and increase in serum total
             IgE by ≥50% of the last recorded IgE value during clinical stability.
        Exclusion Criteria:
          -  occurrence of ≥3 ABPA exacerbations in the last 18 months before enrollment
          -  contraindications to the use of either prednisolone or itraconazole
          -  subjects who have received oral prednisolone (or equivalent) ≥30 mg for ≥2 weeks or
             itraconazole (or voriconazole or posaconazole or isavuconazole) for more than 2 weeks,
             in the last 3 months
          -  chronic medical illnesses, including uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, chronic renal
             failure, chronic liver failure, chronic heart failure, and others
          -  patient on immunosuppressive drugs
          -  pregnancy
          -  enrollment in another trial of ABPA
          -  failure to provide informed consent
          -  asthma exacerbation: worsening respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours without
             immunological or radiological deterioration of ABPA
          -  infective/bronchiectasis exacerbation: clinical deterioration for at least 24 hours
             with increase in cough; breathlessness; sputum volume or consistency; sputum
             purulence; fatigue, malaise, or fever; and hemoptysis without immunological or
             radiological deterioration of ABPA
          -  serologic ABPA

Study details
    Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis

NCT06174922

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

3 May 2024

Step 1 Get in touch with the nearest study center
We have submitted the contact information you provided to the research team at {{SITE_NAME}}. A copy of the message has been sent to your email for your records.
Would you like to be notified about other trials? Sign up for Patient Notification Services.
Sign up

Send a message

Enter your contact details to connect with study team

Investigator Avatar

Primary Contact

  Other languages supported:

First name*
Last name*
Email*
Phone number*
Other language

FAQs

Learn more about clinical trials

What is a clinical trial?

A clinical trial is a study designed to test specific interventions or treatments' effectiveness and safety, paving the way for new, innovative healthcare solutions.

Why should I take part in a clinical trial?

Participating in a clinical trial provides early access to potentially effective treatments and directly contributes to the healthcare advancements that benefit us all.

How long does a clinical trial take place?

The duration of clinical trials varies. Some trials last weeks, some years, depending on the phase and intention of the trial.

Do I get compensated for taking part in clinical trials?

Compensation varies per trial. Some offer payment or reimbursement for time and travel, while others may not.

How safe are clinical trials?

Clinical trials follow strict ethical guidelines and protocols to safeguard participants' health. They are closely monitored and safety reviewed regularly.
Add a private note
  • abc Select a piece of text.
  • Add notes visible only to you.
  • Send it to people through a passcode protected link.