Overview
Comparison of two surgical techniques commonly used for reconstruction of the scapholunate (SL) ligament. A randomized multicenter study.
Description
This multicentre study aim to compare two surgical techniques commonly used for reconstruction of the scapholunate (SL) ligament. The investigators compare patient reported, clinical and radiological outcomes up to 10 years after treatment of complete dynamic or static but reducible SL ligament lesions. The participants are randomized to two treatments. Effect parameters before and after intervention are compared between groups.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-60 years (both included).
- Symptomatic SL instability (VAS score ³3, QDASH score ³ 20).
- > 6 weeks since symptomatic hand trauma (chronic SL lesions).
- SL gapping on radiographic stress views or SL gapping (³2mm) on static PA views.
- Complete SL ligament lesion confirmed by wrist arthroscopy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Geissler grade 1-3 SLL injury (evaluated by arthroscopy).
- Concomitant complete luno-triquetral (LT) ligament injury (evaluated by arthroscopy).
- Lesion of TFCC leading to DRUJ instability (evaluated by arthroscopy).
- Radiocarpal or midcarpal arthritis evaluated by arthroscopy.
- Previous fracture in carpus or intraarticular radius fracture with step off (³2 mm), disposing to posttraumatic arthritis.
- Adverse effects after extra articular radial fractures (dorsal angulation ³10 grader).
- Peroperatively non-reducible scaphoid flexion/SL gap.
- Terminal illness or severe medical illness: ASA score higher than or equal to 3.