Overview
In patients that did a full mouth implant supported rehabilitation does Cad/Cam Monolithic Zirconia compared to Cad/Cam Zirconia Suprastructure (zirconium oxide (Yttrium - partially stabilized with tetragonal polycrystalline structure) veneered with feldspathic ceramic, has less post-insertion complications after at least 1-Year follow-up ?
Description
Study the behavior of implant supported rehabilitations made from full-zirconium dioxide (monolithic with buccal veneer (MZ) or full contour monolithic (FCMZ) ) and zirconia veneered with feldspathic (PVZ) in full-mouth type of rehabilitations (maxilla and mandible).
In a private clinic we will record the behavior, regarding prosthodontic and biological complications in different groups (MZ vs FCMZ vs PVZ) after at least 1 year in function.
We will make calibration of the investigators for prosthodontic and biological assessement and accepting an inter-observer agreement (Kappa) of 0.9 for each parameter.
Recording will be made without the help of magnifying utilities such as magnifying glasses or optical microscopes.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria:
- Maxilla and/or Mandible Implant full-mouth restoration
- Monolithic ceramic or zirconia-feldspathic restoration
- be at least 18 years of age;
- present no systemic or local absolute contraindications for endosseous implant placement;
- at least 1 Year Follow-up
Exclusion Criteria:
- the presence of any systemic disease or condition that could compromise postoperative healing or osseointegration.
- Not full mouth rehabilitation