Description

This study is a randomized control trial focusing on rates of treatment initiation, engagement, and outcome in Black adults assigned to CBT4CBT in the Black Church relative to the standard of care for this population. This study is focusing on individuals with AUD as the needs assessment indicated that as the most common substance use problem in this setting. Moreover, our focus groups and work with Church staff has indicated that alcohol use is less stigmatized within the Black and the Church communities than other substance use. Thus, while individuals with other substance use will be included, positioning the study as focusing primarily on alcohol use will avoid potential issues of stigma and thus may facilitate recruitment.

Selecting a comparison condition for this novel intervention strategy is complex.

As the primary rationale for delivering treatment in the Black church setting is that this national network is seen as a trusted institution in the Black community, our research questions center around (1) whether delivering CBT4CBT in the Black church is a safe and effective alternative to standard care, (2) whether it engages and retains individuals better than standard specialty care, (3) the extent to which this strategy reaches individuals who would not otherwise seek treatment for AUD, (4) what kinds of individuals are particularly suited to this setting, and (5) the relative costs of this novel form of treatment delivery. Thus, a standard specialty care at Midwestern Connecticut Council on Alcohol (MCCA) as the comparison condition was selected. MCCA is a non-profit, community-based provider in the predominantly Black Dixwell neighborhood, not far from Dixwell Church and has a positive reputation in the Black community. The primary treatment modality is group therapy. In 2019, MCCA treated over 500 unique individuals (44% female, 35% African American, 20% Latino). MCCA staff are diverse and multidisciplinary. Clinic Director Steven Palma has agreed to provide a dedicated triage slot for this study so individuals can be admitted and assigned a group within one week, reducing a key barrier.

The two study settings will be balanced in several ways, with few barriers to care, both in the same neighborhood, and assignment of participants to a group within one week of randomization, thus preserving equipoise and balancing attractiveness of both sites to participants as much as possible. They will differ primarily in setting (church versus specialty care), in treatment content (CBT4CBT with spirituality elements versus group treatment with some CBT content), and group leaders (CHAs versus masters-level staff).